Hasselblad X1D vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C
60 Imaging
82 Features
74 Overall
78
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80
Hasselblad X1D vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Launched June 2016
- Updated by Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Released June 2019
- Older Model is Hasselblad X1D
- Updated by Hasselblad X2D
Hasselblad X1D vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Hasselblad X1D versus Hasselblad X1D II 50C, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras and both are designed by Hasselblad. The image resolution of the X1D (51MP) and the X1D II 50C (51MP) is very well matched and they use the exact same sensor sizing (Medium format).
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe X1D was revealed 4 years earlier than the X1D II 50C and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go through a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple summation of how the X1D scores against the X1D II 50C in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Hasselblad X1D vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Hasselblad X1D and Hasselblad X1D II 50C. The full galleries are available at Hasselblad X1D Gallery and Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
X1D | X1D II 50C |
---|
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Hasselblad X1D
X1D II 50C | X1D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2019 | June 2016 | Fresher by 36 months | |
Display dimension | 3.60" | 3" | Larger display (+0.6") | |
Display resolution | 2360k | 920k | Sharper display (+1440k dot) |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Hasselblad X1D II 50C
X1D | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Hasselblad X1D vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Hasselblad X1D offers physical dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Hasselblad X1D II 50C has measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs).
Look at the Hasselblad X1D versus Hasselblad X1D II 50C in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the X1D compared to the X1D II 50C.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the X1D and X1D II 50C is 60 and 60 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizing merely by checking specifications. The photograph below might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the X1D and X1D II 50C.
To sum up, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same MP and you should expect similar quality of photos although you would want to consider the release date of the products into consideration. The older X1D is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Hasselblad X1D vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Specifications
Hasselblad X1D | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Hasselblad | Hasselblad |
Model | Hasselblad X1D | Hasselblad X1D II 50C |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Launched | 2016-06-22 | 2019-06-19 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Medium format |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 44 x 33mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 1,452.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixels | 51 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1 and 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 8272 x 6200 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 117 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | Hasselblad X |
Available lenses | 4 | 13 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 0.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3.60 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 2,360k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | 3,690k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.87x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/10000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.3fps | 2.7fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | 2720 x 1530 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 2720x1530 |
Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725g (1.60 lbs) | 725g (1.60 lbs) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 102 | 102 |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | 26.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | 14.8 |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | 4489 |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Storage slots | 2 | 2 |
Cost at release | $6,495 | $5,750 |