Hasselblad X1D vs Kodak S-1
60 Imaging
82 Features
74 Overall
78
88 Imaging
53 Features
61 Overall
56
Hasselblad X1D vs Kodak S-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Announced June 2016
- Updated by Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 290g - 116 x 68 x 36mm
- Introduced June 2014
Hasselblad X1D vs Kodak S-1 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Hasselblad X1D vs Kodak S-1, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Hasselblad and Kodak. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and S-1 (16MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and S-1 (Four Thirds) provide totally different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe X1D was manufactured 2 years after the S-1 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise overview of how the X1D matches up against the S-1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Hasselblad X1D vs Kodak S-1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Hasselblad X1D & Kodak Pixpro S-1. The entire galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X1D Gallery & Kodak S-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Kodak S-1
X1D | S-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2016 | June 2014 | More modern by 25 months | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Kodak S-1 over the Hasselblad X1D
S-1 | X1D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Kodak S-1
X1D | S-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements | |
Display resolution | 920k | 920k | Identical display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D vs Kodak S-1 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Hasselblad X1D features outside measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) and the Kodak S-1 has specifications of 116mm x 68mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.4") along with a weight of 290 grams (0.64 lbs).
Check the Hasselblad X1D vs Kodak S-1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select during that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the X1D against the S-1.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the X1D and S-1 is 60 and 88 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D vs Kodak S-1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to envision the difference between sensor sizes purely by checking specs. The image below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the X1D and S-1.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The X1D due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D will resolve greater detail due to its extra 35MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more recent X1D is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Hasselblad X1D vs Kodak S-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D vs Kodak S-1 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D | Kodak Pixpro S-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Hasselblad | Kodak |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D | Kodak Pixpro S-1 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2016-06-22 | 2014-06-24 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4640 x 3480 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 4 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.3fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, Red-Eye Reduction, Fill Flash, Flash Off, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain Sync, Slow Sync+ Red-Eye Reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | none |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725 grams (1.60 lb) | 290 grams (0.64 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 116 x 68 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 410 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LB-070 |
Self timer | Yes | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Two | Single |
Price at launch | $6,495 | $250 |