Hasselblad X1D vs Leica M-Monochrom
60 Imaging
82 Features
74 Overall
78
78 Imaging
65 Features
23 Overall
48
Hasselblad X1D vs Leica M-Monochrom Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Announced June 2016
- Updated by Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 160 - 10000
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Released May 2012
Hasselblad X1D vs Leica M-Monochrom Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Hasselblad X1D versus Leica M-Monochrom, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras by competitors Hasselblad and Leica. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and M-Monochrom (18MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and M-Monochrom (Full frame) enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe X1D was brought out 4 years after the M-Monochrom which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the X1D matches up vs the M-Monochrom with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Hasselblad X1D vs Leica M-Monochrom Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Hasselblad X1D and Leica M-Monochrom. The entire galleries are available at Hasselblad X1D Gallery and Leica M-Monochrom Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Leica M-Monochrom
X1D | M-Monochrom | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2016 | May 2012 | More modern by 51 months | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Leica M-Monochrom over the Hasselblad X1D
M-Monochrom | X1D |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Leica M-Monochrom
X1D | M-Monochrom | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D vs Leica M-Monochrom Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Hasselblad X1D provides outer dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Leica M-Monochrom has measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") and a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs).
Contrast the Hasselblad X1D versus Leica M-Monochrom in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the X1D against the M-Monochrom.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the X1D and M-Monochrom is 60 and 78 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D vs Leica M-Monochrom Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizes purely by reviewing specifications. The pic here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the X1D and M-Monochrom.
Plainly, both of those cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The X1D featuring a bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF easier and the Hasselblad X1D will offer you greater detail having its extra 33MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The fresher X1D will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Hasselblad X1D vs Leica M-Monochrom Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D vs Leica M-Monochrom Specifications
Hasselblad X1D | Leica M-Monochrom | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Hasselblad | Leica |
Model | Hasselblad X1D | Leica M-Monochrom |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Announced | 2016-06-22 | 2012-05-10 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Medium format | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 36 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 864.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51MP | 18MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 5212 x 3472 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 10000 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 160 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | Leica M |
Total lenses | 4 | 59 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" |
Display resolution | 920k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | - | TFT color LCD with a sapphire glass LCD cover |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (rangefinder) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.68x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 32s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.3 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/2000s | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725 grams (1.60 lb) | 600 grams (1.32 lb) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC card |
Card slots | 2 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $6,495 | $7,950 |