Hasselblad X1D vs Leica M Typ 240
60 Imaging
82 Features
74 Overall
78
74 Imaging
69 Features
47 Overall
60
Hasselblad X1D vs Leica M Typ 240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Announced June 2016
- Successor is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Revealed September 2012
Hasselblad X1D vs Leica M Typ 240 Overview
Following is a complete assessment of the Hasselblad X1D and Leica M Typ 240, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by manufacturers Hasselblad and Leica. There is a huge difference among the image resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and M Typ 240 (24MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and M Typ 240 (Full frame) boast different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe X1D was introduced 3 years after the M Typ 240 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short overview of how the X1D scores against the M Typ 240 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Hasselblad X1D vs Leica M Typ 240 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Hasselblad X1D and Leica M Typ 240. The whole galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X1D Gallery and Leica M Typ 240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Leica M Typ 240
X1D | M Typ 240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2016 | September 2012 | More modern by 46 months | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Hasselblad X1D
M Typ 240 | X1D |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Leica M Typ 240
X1D | M Typ 240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display dimensions | |
Display resolution | 920k | 920k | Same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D vs Leica M Typ 240 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera, you should think about its weight and size. The Hasselblad X1D provides outside dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Leica M Typ 240 has specifications of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") along with a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs).
Compare the Hasselblad X1D and Leica M Typ 240 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the X1D versus the M Typ 240.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the X1D and M Typ 240 is 60 and 74 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D vs Leica M Typ 240 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizes just by checking out specifications. The picture here might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the X1D and M Typ 240.
To sum up, both of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The X1D using its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Hasselblad X1D will provide greater detail using its extra 27 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more modern X1D should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Hasselblad X1D vs Leica M Typ 240 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D vs Leica M Typ 240 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D | Leica M Typ 240 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Hasselblad | Leica |
Model | Hasselblad X1D | Leica M Typ 240 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Announced | 2016-06-22 | 2012-09-17 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 36 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 864.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51MP | 24MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 5952 x 3976 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | Leica M |
Total lenses | 4 | 59 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 920k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (rangefinder) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 1 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.68x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.3fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/2000 secs | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725g (1.60 lbs) | 680g (1.50 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 102 | 84 |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | 24.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | 13.3 |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | 1860 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 500 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Two | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $6,495 | $5,479 |