Hasselblad X1D vs Leica T Type 701
60 Imaging
81 Features
74 Overall
78
85 Imaging
57 Features
56 Overall
56
Hasselblad X1D vs Leica T Type 701 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Launched June 2016
- Newer Model is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12500
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica L Mount
- 384g - 134 x 69 x 33mm
- Launched April 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Hasselblad X1D vs Leica T Type 701 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Hasselblad X1D vs Leica T Type 701, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Hasselblad and Leica. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and T Type 701 (16MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and T Type 701 (APS-C) provide different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe X1D was introduced 2 years later than the T Type 701 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summary of how the X1D matches up vs the T Type 701 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Hasselblad X1D vs Leica T Type 701 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Hasselblad X1D & Leica T Typ 701. The whole galleries are provided at Hasselblad X1D Gallery & Leica T Type 701 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Leica T Type 701
| X1D | T Type 701 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | June 2016 | April 2014 | More recent by 27 months |
Reasons to pick Leica T Type 701 over the Hasselblad X1D
| T Type 701 | X1D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3.7" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.7") | |
| Screen resolution | 1300k | 920k | Clearer screen (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Leica T Type 701
| X1D | T Type 701 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Hasselblad X1D vs Leica T Type 701 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Hasselblad X1D features physical measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) while the Leica T Type 701 has dimensions of 134mm x 69mm x 33mm (5.3" x 2.7" x 1.3") with a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs).
Take a look at the Hasselblad X1D vs Leica T Type 701 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at the time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the X1D vs the T Type 701.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the X1D and T Type 701 is 60 and 85 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D vs Leica T Type 701 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to picture the gap between sensor measurements just by reviewing specs. The graphic here may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the X1D and T Type 701.
All in all, both of those cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The X1D having a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Hasselblad X1D will offer more detail using its extra 35 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more recent X1D provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Hasselblad X1D vs Leica T Type 701 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Hasselblad X1D vs Leica T Type 701 Specifications
| Hasselblad X1D | Leica T Typ 701 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Hasselblad | Leica |
| Model type | Hasselblad X1D | Leica T Typ 701 |
| Category | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2016-06-22 | 2014-04-24 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 370.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 51MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4944 x 3278 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 12500 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Hasselblad X | Leica L |
| Total lenses | 4 | 4 |
| Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 1,300 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 2,360 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.3 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.50 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, flash on, flash on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 725 gr (1.60 lbs) | 384 gr (0.85 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 134 x 69 x 33mm (5.3" x 2.7" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 102 | 75 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | 23.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | 12.7 |
| DXO Low light rating | 4489 | 1082 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 400 photos |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | BP-DC13 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | 2 | One |
| Retail pricing | $6,495 | $1,603 |