Hasselblad X1D vs OM System OM-1
60 Imaging
83 Features
74 Overall
79
65 Imaging
64 Features
96 Overall
76
Hasselblad X1D vs OM System OM-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Introduced June 2016
- Updated by Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600 (Expand to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 599g - 135 x 92 x 73mm
- Introduced February 2022
Hasselblad X1D vs OM System OM-1 Overview
Below is a thorough comparison of the Hasselblad X1D and OM System OM-1, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by rivals Hasselblad and Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and OM System OM-1 (20MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and OM System OM-1 (Four Thirds) posses totally different sensor size.
Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth FilmingThe X1D was introduced 6 years earlier than the OM System OM-1 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Hasselblad X1D being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the OM System OM-1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the X1D grades vs the OM System OM-1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Hasselblad X1D vs OM System OM-1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Hasselblad X1D & OM System OM-1. The whole galleries are provided at Hasselblad X1D Gallery & OM System OM-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the OM System OM-1
X1D | OM System OM-1 |
---|
Reasons to pick OM System OM-1 over the Hasselblad X1D
OM System OM-1 | X1D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2022 | June 2016 | More recent by 68 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1620k | 920k | Sharper screen (+700k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and OM System OM-1
X1D | OM System OM-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3.00" | Equal screen size | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Hasselblad X1D vs OM System OM-1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Hasselblad X1D features outside measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) while the OM System OM-1 has proportions of 135mm x 92mm x 73mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.9") accompanied by a weight of 599 grams (1.32 lbs).
Look at the Hasselblad X1D and OM System OM-1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the X1D vs the OM System OM-1.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the X1D and OM System OM-1 is 60 and 65 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D vs OM System OM-1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to see the gap in sensor measurements only by viewing specifications. The graphic below might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the X1D and OM System OM-1.
To sum up, the two cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The X1D having a bigger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Hasselblad X1D will result in greater detail using its extra 31 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively. The older X1D will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Hasselblad X1D vs OM System OM-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D vs OM System OM-1 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D | OM System OM-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Hasselblad | Olympus |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D | OM System OM-1 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2016-06-22 | 2022-02-15 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | Stacked BSI Live MOS Sensor |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 1053 |
Cross type focus points | - | 1053 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 4 | 118 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3.00 inches |
Resolution of display | 920k dot | 1,620k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | 5,760k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.83x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.3fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/2000 secs | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265, HEVC |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725g (1.60 pounds) | 599g (1.32 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 135 x 92 x 73mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 520 photos |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLX-1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) |
Storage slots | Two | Two |
Cost at launch | $6,495 | $2,199 |