Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1X
60 Imaging
82 Features
74 Overall
78
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1X Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Announced June 2016
- Replacement is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Revealed January 2019
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M1 II
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1X Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1X, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras by companies Hasselblad and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and E-M1X (20MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and E-M1X (Four Thirds) feature different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe X1D was revealed 3 years prior to the E-M1X which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Hasselblad X1D being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving through a complete comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the X1D grades versus the E-M1X in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1X Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Hasselblad X1D and Olympus OM-D E-M1X. The full galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X1D Gallery and Olympus E-M1X Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Olympus E-M1X
X1D | E-M1X |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Hasselblad X1D
E-M1X | X1D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2019 | June 2016 | Newer by 31 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 920k | Crisper display (+117k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Olympus E-M1X
X1D | E-M1X | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1X Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Hasselblad X1D comes with physical measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) and the Olympus E-M1X has sizing of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") with a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs).
Look at the Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1X in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the X1D and the E-M1X.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the X1D and E-M1X is 60 and 54 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1X Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions just by going over technical specs. The picture here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the X1D and E-M1X.
As you have seen, both of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The X1D with its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Hasselblad X1D will deliver extra detail because of its extra 31MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more aged X1D is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1X Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1X Specifications
Hasselblad X1D | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Hasselblad | Olympus |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D | Olympus OM-D E-M1X |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Announced | 2016-06-22 | 2019-01-24 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Dual TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 4 | 107 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 1,037 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.3 frames/s | 60.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/2000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) |
GPS | Built-in | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 lbs) | 997 gr (2.20 lbs) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 870 pictures |
Style of battery | - | Built-in |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | - |
Storage slots | 2 | 2 |
Launch price | $6,495 | $2,999 |