Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-P2
60 Imaging
82 Features
74 Overall
78
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-P2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Introduced June 2016
- Refreshed by Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Launched April 2010
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-P1
- Renewed by Olympus E-P3
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-P2 Overview
Below is a in-depth overview of the Hasselblad X1D versus Olympus E-P2, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Hasselblad and Olympus. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and E-P2 (12MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and E-P2 (Four Thirds) posses totally different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe X1D was launched 6 years later than the E-P2 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the X1D scores versus the E-P2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-P2 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Hasselblad X1D and Olympus PEN E-P2. The complete galleries are provided at Hasselblad X1D Gallery and Olympus E-P2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Olympus E-P2
X1D | E-P2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2016 | April 2010 | More recent by 76 months | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Hasselblad X1D
E-P2 | X1D |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Olympus E-P2
X1D | E-P2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-P2 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Hasselblad X1D features physical dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) and the Olympus E-P2 has proportions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Compare the Hasselblad X1D versus Olympus E-P2 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have during that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the X1D compared to the E-P2.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the X1D and E-P2 is 60 and 86 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-P2 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to envision the contrast in sensor measurements merely by looking through specifications. The graphic underneath should offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the X1D and E-P2.
To sum up, each of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The X1D featuring a larger sensor will make achieving bokeh easier and the Hasselblad X1D will provide you with greater detail utilizing its extra 39 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The newer X1D is going to have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-P2 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D | Olympus PEN E-P2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Hasselblad | Olympus |
Model | Hasselblad X1D | Olympus PEN E-P2 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2016-06-22 | 2010-04-22 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4032 x 3024 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 4 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | - | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.3 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/2000 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 lbs) | 355 gr (0.78 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 102 | 56 |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | 21.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | 10.4 |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | 505 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 shots |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLS-1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC card |
Storage slots | Two | 1 |
Retail cost | $6,495 | $799 |