Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-PM2
60 Imaging
82 Features
74 Overall
78


89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-PM2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Announced June 2016
- New Model is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Released May 2013
- Superseded the Olympus E-PM1

Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-PM2 Overview
Here is a in depth review of the Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-PM2, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Hasselblad and Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and E-PM2 (16MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and E-PM2 (Four Thirds) have totally different sensor size.

The X1D was manufactured 3 years later than the E-PM2 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief overview of how the X1D scores vs the E-PM2 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-PM2 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Hasselblad X1D & Olympus PEN E-PM2. The entire galleries are provided at Hasselblad X1D Gallery & Olympus E-PM2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Olympus E-PM2
X1D | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2016 | ![]() | May 2013 | Fresher by 38 months |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Hasselblad X1D
E-PM2 | X1D |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Olympus E-PM2
X1D | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-PM2 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Hasselblad X1D comes with outer measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) while the Olympus E-PM2 has specifications of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Check out the Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-PM2 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the X1D versus the E-PM2.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the X1D and E-PM2 is 60 and 89 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-PM2 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizing just by checking out specs. The photograph here might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the X1D and E-PM2.
All in all, each of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The X1D due to its larger sensor will make shooting bokeh easier and the Hasselblad X1D will show extra detail due to its extra 35 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The fresher X1D will have a benefit in sensor technology.

Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-PM2 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Hasselblad | Olympus |
Model | Hasselblad X1D | Olympus PEN E-PM2 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2016-06-22 | 2013-05-21 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 4 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.3 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/2000 secs | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725g (1.60 pounds) | 269g (0.59 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 102 | 72 |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | 12.2 |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | 932 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 360 photos |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Two | 1 |
Retail cost | $6,495 | $448 |