Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus PEN-F
60 Imaging
82 Features
74 Overall
78


84 Imaging
59 Features
79 Overall
67
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus PEN-F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Launched June 2016
- Successor is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 427g - 125 x 72 x 37mm
- Released January 2016

Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus PEN-F Overview
In this write-up, we are looking at the Hasselblad X1D versus Olympus PEN-F, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Hasselblad and Olympus. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and PEN-F (20MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and PEN-F (Four Thirds) use different sensor dimensions.

The X1D was launched 5 months after the PEN-F and they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a brief summation of how the X1D scores versus the PEN-F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus PEN-F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Hasselblad X1D & Olympus PEN-F. The complete galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X1D Gallery & Olympus PEN-F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Olympus PEN-F
X1D | PEN-F |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus PEN-F over the Hasselblad X1D
PEN-F | X1D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 920k | Clearer display (+117k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Olympus PEN-F
X1D | PEN-F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2016 | ![]() | January 2016 | Similar age |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus PEN-F Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Hasselblad X1D features physical dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) while the Olympus PEN-F has proportions of 125mm x 72mm x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") along with a weight of 427 grams (0.94 lbs).
Compare the Hasselblad X1D versus Olympus PEN-F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at the time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the X1D compared to the PEN-F.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the X1D and PEN-F is 60 and 84 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus PEN-F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizes simply by reading through specs. The image below should provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the X1D and PEN-F.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The X1D because of its larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D will give you more detail utilizing its extra 31MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images far more aggressively.

Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus PEN-F Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus PEN-F Specifications
Hasselblad X1D | Olympus PEN-F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Hasselblad | Olympus |
Model | Hasselblad X1D | Olympus PEN-F |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2016-06-22 | 2016-01-27 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 4 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.62x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.3fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain) |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/2000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725 grams (1.60 lbs) | 427 grams (0.94 lbs) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 125 x 72 x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 102 | 74 |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | 12.4 |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | 894 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 photos |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLN-1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 seconds, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Two | Single |
Retail price | $6,495 | $1,000 |