Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GF3
60 Imaging
82 Features
74 Overall
78


90 Imaging
48 Features
48 Overall
48
Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GF3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Announced June 2016
- Successor is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 160 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 264g - 108 x 67 x 32mm
- Revealed August 2011
- Previous Model is Panasonic GF2
- Successor is Panasonic GF5

Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GF3 Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GF3, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Hasselblad and Panasonic. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and GF3 (12MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and GF3 (Four Thirds) offer different sensor measurements.

The X1D was introduced 4 years after the GF3 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the X1D matches up vs the GF3 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GF3 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Hasselblad X1D and Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3. The whole galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X1D Gallery and Panasonic GF3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Panasonic GF3
X1D | GF3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2016 | ![]() | August 2011 | Newer by 60 months |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic GF3 over the Hasselblad X1D
GF3 | X1D |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Panasonic GF3
X1D | GF3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GF3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Hasselblad X1D has outside measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) and the Panasonic GF3 has specifications of 108mm x 67mm x 32mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 264 grams (0.58 lbs).
Take a look at the Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GF3 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the X1D vs the GF3.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the X1D and GF3 is 60 and 90 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GF3 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by checking specifications. The pic underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the X1D and GF3.
To sum up, each of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The X1D using its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Hasselblad X1D will resolve extra detail using its extra 39MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The fresher X1D should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GF3 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GF3 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Hasselblad | Panasonic |
Model | Hasselblad X1D | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2016-06-22 | 2011-08-11 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 160 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 4 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 920k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.3 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.30 m |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/2000 secs | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725g (1.60 pounds) | 264g (0.58 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 108 x 67 x 32mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 102 | 50 |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | 20.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | 10.1 |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | 459 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 2 | One |
Retail cost | $6,495 | $360 |