Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GF8
60 Imaging
82 Features
74 Overall
78
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d9e1/0d9e162744f8f0f7e723c3984dbbdfc197c401b0" alt="Hasselblad X1D front Hasselblad X1D front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27fce/27fced1b30df29f9c1d9c26f1646ff64695d521a" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF8 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF8 front"
90 Imaging
54 Features
62 Overall
57
Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GF8 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Released June 2016
- Updated by Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 266g - 107 x 65 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2016
- Replaced the Panasonic GF7
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GF8 Overview
In this article, we are comparing the Hasselblad X1D and Panasonic GF8, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Hasselblad and Panasonic. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and GF8 (16MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and GF8 (Four Thirds) come with totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The X1D was launched 5 months later than the GF8 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the X1D grades versus the GF8 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GF8 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Hasselblad X1D and Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF8. The complete galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X1D Gallery and Panasonic GF8 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Panasonic GF8
X1D | GF8 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic GF8 over the Hasselblad X1D
GF8 | X1D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper display (+120k dot) |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Panasonic GF8
X1D | GF8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2016 | ![]() | February 2016 | Same generation |
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GF8 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Hasselblad X1D offers external measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) while the Panasonic GF8 has specifications of 107mm x 65mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 266 grams (0.59 lbs).
Check out the Hasselblad X1D and Panasonic GF8 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are using at that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the X1D against the GF8.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/296bf/296bf2cdc0152ef0f1ebb114821985f74fe509ea" alt="Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GF8 size comparison Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GF8 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the X1D and GF8 is 60 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13206/132060eeb749b44817a208ae50fed300e2cffc5e" alt="Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GF8 top view buttons comparison Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GF8 top view buttons comparison"
Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GF8 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizing simply by looking through technical specs. The photograph below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the X1D and GF8.
As you have seen, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The X1D due to its larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Hasselblad X1D will provide you with more detail utilizing its extra 35MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics far more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03611/036112374feade52875d88dede42eda546825809" alt="Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GF8 sensor size comparison Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GF8 sensor size comparison"
Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GF8 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eee9c/eee9c647cae3e40eb12ca1fb09d84ecbf4f15cdf" alt="Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GF8 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GF8 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GF8 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF8 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Hasselblad | Panasonic |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF8 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2016-06-22 | 2016-02-15 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4592 x 3448 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 4 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/500s |
Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.3 frames/s | 5.8 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.60 m (at ISO 200) |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, flash on, flash on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, flash off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/2000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 50p, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 pounds) | 266 gr (0.59 pounds) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 107 x 65 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 230 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3-shot/10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | 2 | Single |
Launch price | $6,495 | $549 |