Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GX1
60 Imaging
81 Features
74 Overall
78
87 Imaging
51 Features
54 Overall
52
Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Revealed June 2016
- Later Model is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 160 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 318g - 116 x 68 x 39mm
- Revealed February 2012
- Later Model is Panasonic GX7
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GX1 Overview
The following is a complete analysis of the Hasselblad X1D and Panasonic GX1, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Hasselblad and Panasonic. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and GX1 (16MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and GX1 (Four Thirds) offer different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe X1D was introduced 4 years after the GX1 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the X1D matches up versus the GX1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GX1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Hasselblad X1D & Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1. The whole galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X1D Gallery & Panasonic GX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Panasonic GX1
| X1D | GX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2016 | February 2012 | Newer by 53 months | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic GX1 over the Hasselblad X1D
| GX1 | X1D |
|---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Panasonic GX1
| X1D | GX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GX1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you have to factor its weight and size. The Hasselblad X1D comes with outside dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) and the Panasonic GX1 has specifications of 116mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") with a weight of 318 grams (0.70 lbs).
Check the Hasselblad X1D and Panasonic GX1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have during that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the X1D against the GX1.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the X1D and GX1 is 60 and 87 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GX1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to picture the difference between sensor dimensions only by reviewing technical specs. The pic below should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the X1D and GX1.
As you can tell, both of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The X1D with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Hasselblad X1D will offer extra detail using its extra 35MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more modern X1D should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GX1 Specifications
| Hasselblad X1D | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Hasselblad | Panasonic |
| Model type | Hasselblad X1D | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1 |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2016-06-22 | 2012-02-14 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine FHD |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 51 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4592 x 3448 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 160 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
| Total lenses | 4 | 107 |
| Crop factor | 0.8 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.3 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.60 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/2000s | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 725 gr (1.60 lbs) | 318 gr (0.70 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 116 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 102 | 55 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | 20.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | 10.6 |
| DXO Low light rating | 4489 | 703 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 images |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 2 | 1 |
| Price at release | $6,495 | $228 |