Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GX85
60 Imaging
82 Features
74 Overall
78
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d9e1/0d9e162744f8f0f7e723c3984dbbdfc197c401b0" alt="Hasselblad X1D front Hasselblad X1D front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/273c0/273c0c86fa0d6e8d3883c5b8e9356e362cd24887" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 front"
83 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62
Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GX85 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Introduced June 2016
- Replacement is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 122 x 71 x 44mm
- Announced April 2016
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-GX80 / Lumix DMC-GX7 Mark II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GX85 Overview
Below is a comprehensive analysis of the Hasselblad X1D versus Panasonic GX85, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Hasselblad and Panasonic. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and GX85 (16MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and GX85 (Four Thirds) feature different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The X1D was brought out 3 months later than the GX85 so they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick view of how the X1D matches up against the GX85 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GX85 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Hasselblad X1D and Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85. The entire galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X1D Gallery and Panasonic GX85 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Panasonic GX85
X1D | GX85 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic GX85 over the Hasselblad X1D
GX85 | X1D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper screen (+120k dot) |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Panasonic GX85
X1D | GX85 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | June 2016 | ![]() | April 2016 | Same generation |
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GX85 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera often, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Hasselblad X1D features outside measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Panasonic GX85 has proportions of 122mm x 71mm x 44mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).
Check out the Hasselblad X1D versus Panasonic GX85 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the X1D versus the GX85.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b14a/1b14acaeafadcce8c17afcce14ee563fcf2ab86a" alt="Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GX85 size comparison Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GX85 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the X1D and GX85 is 60 and 83 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b0bc/0b0bc1a51d057ca4989bfa03eeb228a6383049ac" alt="Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GX85 top view buttons comparison Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GX85 top view buttons comparison"
Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GX85 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to imagine the difference in sensor measurements merely by researching specifications. The graphic here might give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the X1D and GX85.
To sum up, the 2 cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The X1D because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Hasselblad X1D will render more detail having its extra 35 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs much more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04a07/04a078aada8859cc86072c6f95872b2d666cf8c5" alt="Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GX85 sensor size comparison Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GX85 sensor size comparison"
Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GX85 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5e02/f5e02618e7bc6cef3cf97be003947ee1ab1f71b4" alt="Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GX85 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GX85 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Hasselblad X1D vs Panasonic GX85 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Hasselblad | Panasonic |
Model | Hasselblad X1D | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-GX80 / Lumix DMC-GX7 Mark II |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2016-06-22 | 2016-04-05 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4592 x 3448 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 4 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 2,764 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.3fps | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.00 m (at ISO 200) |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, forced off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725g (1.60 lb) | 426g (0.94 lb) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 122 x 71 x 44mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 102 | 71 |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | 22.9 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | 662 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | Dual | 1 |
Retail cost | $6,495 | $800 |