Hasselblad X1D vs Pentax Q-S1
60 Imaging
81 Features
74 Overall
78
92 Imaging
37 Features
54 Overall
43
Hasselblad X1D vs Pentax Q-S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Released June 2016
- New Model is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 203g - 105 x 58 x 34mm
- Launched August 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Hasselblad X1D vs Pentax Q-S1 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Hasselblad X1D versus Pentax Q-S1, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Hasselblad and Pentax. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and Q-S1 (12MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and Q-S1 (1/1.7") provide totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe X1D was announced 23 months later than the Q-S1 making them a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the X1D matches up against the Q-S1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Hasselblad X1D vs Pentax Q-S1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Hasselblad X1D & Pentax Q-S1. The whole galleries are available at Hasselblad X1D Gallery & Pentax Q-S1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Pentax Q-S1
| X1D | Q-S1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | June 2016 | August 2014 | More recent by 23 months | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax Q-S1 over the Hasselblad X1D
| Q-S1 | X1D |
|---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Pentax Q-S1
| X1D | Q-S1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D vs Pentax Q-S1 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Hasselblad X1D provides outer dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) and the Pentax Q-S1 has dimensions of 105mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs).
Take a look at the Hasselblad X1D versus Pentax Q-S1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the X1D compared to the Q-S1.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the X1D and Q-S1 is 60 and 92 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D vs Pentax Q-S1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to envision the contrast between sensor measurements only by looking at technical specs. The visual here should give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the X1D and Q-S1.
As you can tell, both of those cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The X1D with its larger sensor will make getting shallow DOF easier and the Hasselblad X1D will give greater detail with its extra 39 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos way more aggressively. The more modern X1D is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Hasselblad X1D vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Hasselblad X1D vs Pentax Q-S1 Specifications
| Hasselblad X1D | Pentax Q-S1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Hasselblad | Pentax |
| Model type | Hasselblad X1D | Pentax Q-S1 |
| Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Released | 2016-06-22 | 2014-08-04 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Q Engine |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Medium format | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 51 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Hasselblad X | Pentax Q |
| Number of lenses | 4 | 8 |
| Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.3 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.90 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/2000s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30, 25, 24p), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 725 grams (1.60 lb) | 203 grams (0.45 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 105 x 58 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 102 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 4489 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 250 photographs |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | D-LI68 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | Dual | Single |
| Launch cost | $6,495 | $250 |