Clicky

Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

Portability
60
Imaging
83
Features
74
Overall
79
Hasselblad X1D front
 
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front
Portability
77
Imaging
52
Features
31
Overall
43

Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs

Hasselblad X1D
(Full Review)
  • 51MP - Medium format Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Hasselblad X Mount
  • 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
  • Launched June 2016
  • Replacement is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 50mm (F2.5) lens
  • 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
  • Launched November 2009
Photography Glossary

Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview

Here, we are evaluating the Hasselblad X1D versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Hasselblad and Ricoh. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) provide different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The X1D was brought out 6 years after the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the X1D scores against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
	
	

Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 X1D GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
LaunchedJune 2016November 2009Newer by 81 months
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Hasselblad X1D

 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro X1D 

Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 X1D GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
Manual focus More precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display measurements
Display resolution920k920kSame display resolution
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen

Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and size. The Hasselblad X1D comes with physical measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has specifications of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).

Check out the Hasselblad X1D versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have at that moment. The following is a front view size comparison of the X1D compared to the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the X1D and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 60 and 77 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro top view buttons comparison

Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is very hard to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions simply by seeing specs. The picture here might give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the X1D and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

As you can plainly see, both the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The X1D due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D will provide more detail having its extra 39 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images way more aggressively. The more recent X1D provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro sensor size comparison

Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder

Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Hasselblad X1D Portrait photography highlights
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Portrait photography highlights
89
focusing manually
flash sync is higher than normal (1/2,000s)
fantastic sensor resolution (51 megapixels)
great sensor size (Medium format)
includes face detection autofocus
exports RAW formats
55
manual focus
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW files
does not have liveview
MP count low (12MP)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Hasselblad X1D
Street photography with Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
68
great sensor size (Medium format)
exports RAW formats
features focus by touch
environment proofing
very good high ISO (25,600)
fixed screen
no image stabilization
62
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW files
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Hasselblad X1D Sports photography features
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sports photography features
70
fantastic sensor resolution (51MP)
great sensor size (Medium format)
includes tracking autofocus
environment proofing
slow continuous shooting (2.3 frames per second)
no image stabilization
no phase detect autofocus
32
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
can't change focal length (50mm)
does not have liveview
slow frames per second (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (12MP)
not so great battery (320 shots)
has no phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Hasselblad X1D as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro as a Travel photography camera
64
environment proofing
features focus by touch
fantastic sensor resolution (51MP)
does not have Timelapse mode
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
49
has built in flash
not so great battery (320 CIPA)
MP count low (12MP)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Hasselblad X1D Landscape photography info
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Landscape photography info
80
focusing manually
change lenses (Hasselblad X mount)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
fantastic sensor resolution (51MP)
great sensor size (Medium format)
very good high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW formats
environment proofing
has double storage slots
no image stabilization
does not have Timelapse mode
46
manual focus
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (50mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
does not have liveview
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (12 megapixels)
not so great battery (320 per charge)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D Vlogging info
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Vlogging info
33
built-in touchscreen
includes face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
comes with external microphone port
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
20
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external microphone socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Hasselblad X1D and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
 Hasselblad X1DRicoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
General Information
Brand Name Hasselblad Ricoh
Model Hasselblad X1D Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
Category Pro Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Launched 2016-06-22 2009-11-10
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip - GR engine III
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Medium format APS-C
Sensor measurements 44 x 33mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 1,452.0mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 51MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1 and 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 8272 x 6200 4288 x 2848
Max native ISO 25600 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 200
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Lens
Lens mounting type Hasselblad X fixed lens
Lens focal range - 50mm (1x)
Largest aperture - f/2.5
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Amount of lenses 4 -
Crop factor 0.8 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 920 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 180 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/3200 secs
Continuous shooting rate 2.3 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range no built-in flash 3.00 m
Flash settings no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/2000 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (25p) 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Built-in None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 725g (1.60 pounds) 453g (1.00 pounds)
Physical dimensions 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 102 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 26.2 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 14.8 not tested
DXO Low light score 4489 not tested
Other
Battery life - 320 images
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots Two 1
Cost at launch $6,495 $566