Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
60 Imaging
82 Features
74 Overall
78


77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Launched June 2016
- Replacement is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Launched November 2009

Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Hasselblad X1D versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Hasselblad and Ricoh. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) provide different sensor measurements.

The X1D was brought out 6 years after the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the X1D scores against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Hasselblad X1D and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The entire galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X1D Gallery and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
X1D | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2016 | ![]() | November 2009 | Newer by 81 months |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Hasselblad X1D
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | X1D |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
X1D | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurements |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 920k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and size. The Hasselblad X1D comes with physical measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has specifications of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Check out the Hasselblad X1D versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have at that moment. The following is a front view size comparison of the X1D compared to the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the X1D and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 60 and 77 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions simply by seeing specs. The picture here might give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the X1D and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The X1D due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D will provide more detail having its extra 39 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images way more aggressively. The more recent X1D provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Hasselblad X1D | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Hasselblad | Ricoh |
Model | Hasselblad X1D | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2016-06-22 | 2009-11-10 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4288 x 2848 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 50mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 4 | - |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 180 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/3200 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.3 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/2000 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725g (1.60 pounds) | 453g (1.00 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Two | 1 |
Cost at launch | $6,495 | $566 |