Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12
60 Imaging
83 Features
74 Overall
79
84 Imaging
53 Features
39 Overall
47
Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Introduced June 2016
- Renewed by Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1/9000s Maximum Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
- Launched August 2011
Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Overview
The following is a detailed analysis of the Hasselblad X1D and Ricoh GXR Mount A12, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Hasselblad and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and GXR Mount A12 (12MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and GXR Mount A12 (APS-C) have different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe X1D was brought out 4 years after the GXR Mount A12 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go right into a thorough comparison, here is a short highlight of how the X1D grades vs the GXR Mount A12 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Hasselblad X1D & Ricoh GXR Mount A12. The entire galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X1D Gallery & Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Ricoh GXR Mount A12
X1D | GXR Mount A12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2016 | August 2011 | Newer by 60 months | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR Mount A12 over the Hasselblad X1D
GXR Mount A12 | X1D |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Ricoh GXR Mount A12
X1D | GXR Mount A12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 920k | Equal screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and measurements. The Hasselblad X1D features outer dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 has proportions of 120mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") with a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs).
See the Hasselblad X1D and Ricoh GXR Mount A12 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the X1D compared to the GXR Mount A12.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the X1D and GXR Mount A12 is 60 and 84 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing specs. The image here may provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the X1D and GXR Mount A12.
All in all, both of those cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The X1D due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh simpler and the Hasselblad X1D will deliver extra detail having its extra 39 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more recent X1D provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Hasselblad | Ricoh |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2016-06-22 | 2011-08-05 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4288 x 2848 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | Hasselblad X | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | () |
Number of lenses | 4 | - |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 920k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 1 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/9000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.3 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 9.60 m |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725g (1.60 lb) | 370g (0.82 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 images |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (5 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Dual | 1 |
Price at release | $6,495 | $349 |