Hasselblad X1D vs Samsung NX200
60 Imaging
81 Features
74 Overall
78
90 Imaging
61 Features
57 Overall
59
Hasselblad X1D vs Samsung NX200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Introduced June 2016
- Successor is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 223g - 117 x 63 x 36mm
- Announced February 2012
- Succeeded the Samsung NX100
- Renewed by Samsung NX210
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Hasselblad X1D vs Samsung NX200 Overview
In this write-up, we are contrasting the Hasselblad X1D versus Samsung NX200, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Hasselblad and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and NX200 (20MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and NX200 (APS-C) come with totally different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe X1D was manufactured 4 years later than the NX200 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going through a in depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the X1D grades against the NX200 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Hasselblad X1D vs Samsung NX200 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Hasselblad X1D & Samsung NX200. The entire galleries are provided at Hasselblad X1D Gallery & Samsung NX200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Samsung NX200
| X1D | NX200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | June 2016 | February 2012 | More recent by 53 months | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 614k | Crisper display (+306k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX200 over the Hasselblad X1D
| NX200 | X1D |
|---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Samsung NX200
| X1D | NX200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D vs Samsung NX200 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Hasselblad X1D provides external measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX200 has dimensions of 117mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") having a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs).
Contrast the Hasselblad X1D versus Samsung NX200 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the X1D compared to the NX200.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the X1D and NX200 is 60 and 90 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D vs Samsung NX200 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to see the gap between sensor measurements merely by reviewing specs. The photograph below may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the X1D and NX200.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The X1D featuring a larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Hasselblad X1D will deliver extra detail due to its extra 31MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a little more aggressively. The younger X1D is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Hasselblad X1D vs Samsung NX200 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Hasselblad X1D vs Samsung NX200 Specifications
| Hasselblad X1D | Samsung NX200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Hasselblad | Samsung |
| Model | Hasselblad X1D | Samsung NX200 |
| Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2016-06-22 | 2012-02-28 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 51 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 15 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | Samsung NX |
| Available lenses | 4 | 32 |
| Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 920k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.3 frames per second | 7.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/2000 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 725g (1.60 lb) | 223g (0.49 lb) |
| Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 117 x 63 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 102 | 69 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | 22.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | 12.6 |
| DXO Low light score | 4489 | 618 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 photographs |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | BC1030 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Two | One |
| Retail pricing | $6,495 | $818 |