Hasselblad X1D vs Samsung NX2000
60 Imaging
82 Features
74 Overall
78
89 Imaging
63 Features
68 Overall
65
Hasselblad X1D vs Samsung NX2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Revealed June 2016
- Successor is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 228g - 119 x 65 x 36mm
- Announced November 2013
- Succeeded the Samsung NX1100
- Newer Model is Samsung NX3000
Hasselblad X1D vs Samsung NX2000 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Hasselblad X1D and Samsung NX2000, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Hasselblad and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and NX2000 (20MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and NX2000 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe X1D was manufactured 2 years later than the NX2000 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the X1D scores against the NX2000 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Hasselblad X1D vs Samsung NX2000 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Hasselblad X1D & Samsung NX2000. The entire galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X1D Gallery & Samsung NX2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Samsung NX2000
X1D | NX2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | June 2016 | November 2013 | Fresher by 32 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX2000 over the Hasselblad X1D
NX2000 | X1D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3.7" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.7") | |
Screen resolution | 1152k | 920k | Crisper screen (+232k dot) |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Samsung NX2000
X1D | NX2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Hasselblad X1D vs Samsung NX2000 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Hasselblad X1D has outside measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) and the Samsung NX2000 has specifications of 119mm x 65mm x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") with a weight of 228 grams (0.50 lbs).
Analyze the Hasselblad X1D and Samsung NX2000 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the X1D and the NX2000.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the X1D and NX2000 is 60 and 89 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D vs Samsung NX2000 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizing merely by viewing technical specs. The photograph below should give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the X1D and NX2000.
As you have seen, both the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The X1D featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Hasselblad X1D will provide you with extra detail due to its extra 31 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The newer X1D is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Hasselblad X1D vs Samsung NX2000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D vs Samsung NX2000 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D | Samsung NX2000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Hasselblad | Samsung |
Model | Hasselblad X1D | Samsung NX2000 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2016-06-22 | 2013-11-30 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Hasselblad X | Samsung NX |
Available lenses | 4 | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 1,152k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.3 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/2000s | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725 grams (1.60 lb) | 228 grams (0.50 lb) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 119 x 65 x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 102 | 75 |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | 23.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | 12.3 |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | 908 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 pictures |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC/ MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | Dual | 1 |
Launch price | $6,495 | $599 |