Hasselblad X1D vs Sigma fp
60 Imaging
82 Features
74 Overall
78
84 Imaging
75 Features
79 Overall
76
Hasselblad X1D vs Sigma fp Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Revealed June 2016
- Replacement is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Push to 102400)
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 422g - 113 x 70 x 45mm
- Revealed July 2019
- Refreshed by Sigma fp L
Hasselblad X1D vs Sigma fp Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Hasselblad X1D vs Sigma fp, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Hasselblad and Sigma. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and fp (25MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and fp (Full frame) have different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe X1D was introduced 4 years before the fp which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go into a detailed comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the X1D matches up vs the fp with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Hasselblad X1D vs Sigma fp Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Hasselblad X1D and Sigma fp. The whole galleries are provided at Hasselblad X1D Gallery and Sigma fp Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Sigma fp
X1D | fp |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma fp over the Hasselblad X1D
fp | X1D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2019 | June 2016 | More modern by 37 months | |
Display dimensions | 3.2" | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
Display resolution | 2100k | 920k | Crisper display (+1180k dot) |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Sigma fp
X1D | fp | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Hasselblad X1D vs Sigma fp Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Hasselblad X1D comes with physical dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Sigma fp has measurements of 113mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") with a weight of 422 grams (0.93 lbs).
See the Hasselblad X1D vs Sigma fp in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the X1D compared to the fp.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the X1D and fp is 60 and 84 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D vs Sigma fp Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizes only by reading specifications. The pic below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the X1D and fp.
Plainly, both of those cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The X1D with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Hasselblad X1D will deliver greater detail using its extra 26MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged X1D is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Hasselblad X1D vs Sigma fp Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D vs Sigma fp Specifications
Hasselblad X1D | Sigma fp | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Hasselblad | Sigma |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D | Sigma fp |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2016-06-22 | 2019-07-11 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 35.9 x 23.9mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 858.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixels | 25 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 6 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Hasselblad X | Leica L |
Amount of lenses | 4 | 30 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3.2" |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 2,100 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.3 frames per sec | 12.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/2000 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | No |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725g (1.60 pounds) | 422g (0.93 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 113 x 70 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | BP-51 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 wec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) |
Storage slots | 2 | One |
Launch price | $6,495 | $2,050 |