Hasselblad X1D vs Sigma fp L
60 Imaging
82 Features
74 Overall
78


83 Imaging
82 Features
80 Overall
81
Hasselblad X1D vs Sigma fp L Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Released June 2016
- New Model is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 61MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Raise to 102400)
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 427g - 113 x 70 x 45mm
- Launched March 2021
- Previous Model is Sigma fp

Hasselblad X1D vs Sigma fp L Overview
In this article, we are reviewing the Hasselblad X1D and Sigma fp L, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Hasselblad and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the X1D (51MP) and the fp L (61MP) is very close but the X1D (Medium format) and fp L (Full frame) possess totally different sensor dimensions.

The X1D was announced 5 years before the fp L which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the X1D scores vs the fp L when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Hasselblad X1D vs Sigma fp L Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Hasselblad X1D & Sigma fp L. The whole galleries are provided at Hasselblad X1D Gallery & Sigma fp L Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Sigma fp L
X1D | fp L |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma fp L over the Hasselblad X1D
fp L | X1D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | March 2021 | ![]() | June 2016 | Newer by 57 months |
Display sizing | 3.2" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Display resolution | 2100k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper display (+1180k dot) |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Sigma fp L
X1D | fp L | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Hasselblad X1D vs Sigma fp L Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Hasselblad X1D has got external measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) while the Sigma fp L has dimensions of 113mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") along with a weight of 427 grams (0.94 lbs).
Examine the Hasselblad X1D and Sigma fp L in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the X1D against the fp L.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the X1D and fp L is 60 and 83 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D vs Sigma fp L Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions simply by looking through technical specs. The picture here should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the X1D and fp L.
As you can tell, each of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The X1D with its larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Sigma fp L will result in more detail with its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged X1D will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Hasselblad X1D vs Sigma fp L Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D vs Sigma fp L Specifications
Hasselblad X1D | Sigma fp L | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Hasselblad | Sigma |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D | Sigma fp L |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2016-06-22 | 2021-03-25 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 36 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 864.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixels | 61 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 9520 x 6328 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 6 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Hasselblad X | Leica L |
Total lenses | 4 | 40 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3.2" |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 2,100 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 3,680 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.83x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.3 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 100p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | Yes (USB Power Delivery supported) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 lb) | 427 gr (0.94 lb) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 113 x 70 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BP-51 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) |
Storage slots | 2 | Single |
Cost at launch | $6,495 | $2,499 |