Hasselblad X1D vs Sony NEX-3N
60 Imaging
82 Features
74 Overall
78
89 Imaging
57 Features
52 Overall
55
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony NEX-3N Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Announced June 2016
- Updated by Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
- Revealed February 2013
- Old Model is Sony NEX-F3
- Newer Model is Sony a5000
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony NEX-3N Overview
In this write-up, we will be comparing the Hasselblad X1D versus Sony NEX-3N, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Hasselblad and Sony. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and NEX-3N (16MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and NEX-3N (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe X1D was released 3 years after the NEX-3N which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summary of how the X1D scores against the NEX-3N in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony NEX-3N Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Hasselblad X1D and Sony Alpha NEX-3N. The complete galleries are available at Hasselblad X1D Gallery and Sony NEX-3N Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Sony NEX-3N
X1D | NEX-3N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2016 | February 2013 | More modern by 41 months | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Hasselblad X1D
NEX-3N | X1D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Sony NEX-3N
X1D | NEX-3N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony NEX-3N Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Hasselblad X1D comes with exterior dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-3N has proportions of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Check out the Hasselblad X1D versus Sony NEX-3N in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the X1D compared to the NEX-3N.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the X1D and NEX-3N is 60 and 89 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony NEX-3N Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizes merely by going over technical specs. The picture underneath should give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the X1D and NEX-3N.
As you can tell, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The X1D because of its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Hasselblad X1D will deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 35MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively. The younger X1D will have an edge in sensor tech.
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony NEX-3N Specifications
Hasselblad X1D | Sony Alpha NEX-3N | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Hasselblad | Sony |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D | Sony Alpha NEX-3N |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2016-06-22 | 2013-02-25 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 16000 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Hasselblad X | Sony E |
Amount of lenses | 4 | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.3 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/2000 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725 grams (1.60 pounds) | 269 grams (0.59 pounds) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 102 | 74 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | 12.5 |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | 1067 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 480 photographs |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Dual | Single |
Price at release | $6,495 | $399 |