Hasselblad X1D vs Sony NEX-5
60 Imaging
82 Features
74 Overall
78


89 Imaging
54 Features
58 Overall
55
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony NEX-5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Launched June 2016
- Updated by Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 287g - 111 x 59 x 38mm
- Released June 2010
- Newer Model is Sony NEX-5N

Hasselblad X1D vs Sony NEX-5 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Hasselblad X1D versus Sony NEX-5, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Hasselblad and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and NEX-5 (14MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and NEX-5 (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizing.

The X1D was revealed 6 years after the NEX-5 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick summary of how the X1D scores vs the NEX-5 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Hasselblad X1D vs Sony NEX-5 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Hasselblad X1D & Sony Alpha NEX-5. The full galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X1D Gallery & Sony NEX-5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Sony NEX-5
X1D | NEX-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2016 | ![]() | June 2010 | More modern by 74 months |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-5 over the Hasselblad X1D
NEX-5 | X1D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Sony NEX-5
X1D | NEX-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurement |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 920k | Exact same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony NEX-5 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Hasselblad X1D provides exterior measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) and the Sony NEX-5 has dimensions of 111mm x 59mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") with a weight of 287 grams (0.63 lbs).
Look at the Hasselblad X1D versus Sony NEX-5 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at the time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the X1D and the NEX-5.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the X1D and NEX-5 is 60 and 89 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D vs Sony NEX-5 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizes only by reading technical specs. The pic underneath will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the X1D and NEX-5.
As you have seen, the two cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The X1D with its larger sensor will make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D will offer you more detail because of its extra 37MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more recent X1D is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.

Hasselblad X1D vs Sony NEX-5 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D vs Sony NEX-5 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D | Sony Alpha NEX-5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Hasselblad | Sony |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D | Sony Alpha NEX-5 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2016-06-22 | 2010-06-07 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4592 x 3056 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Hasselblad X | Sony E |
Total lenses | 4 | 121 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.3 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 12.00 m |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/2000 secs | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725g (1.60 lb) | 287g (0.63 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 111 x 59 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 102 | 69 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | 22.2 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | 12.2 |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | 796 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 pictures |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 2 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $6,495 | $599 |