Hasselblad X1D vs Sony NEX-C3
60 Imaging
82 Features
74 Overall
78


91 Imaging
56 Features
57 Overall
56
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony NEX-C3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Announced June 2016
- Successor is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
- Introduced August 2011
- Old Model is Sony NEX-3
- Later Model is Sony NEX-F3

Hasselblad X1D vs Sony NEX-C3 Overview
Following is a in-depth overview of the Hasselblad X1D and Sony NEX-C3, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Hasselblad and Sony. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and NEX-C3 (16MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and NEX-C3 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor size.

The X1D was unveiled 4 years after the NEX-C3 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving in to a complete comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the X1D scores against the NEX-C3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Hasselblad X1D vs Sony NEX-C3 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Hasselblad X1D & Sony Alpha NEX-C3. The full galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X1D Gallery & Sony NEX-C3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Sony NEX-C3
X1D | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2016 | ![]() | August 2011 | More modern by 59 months |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-C3 over the Hasselblad X1D
NEX-C3 | X1D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Sony NEX-C3
X1D | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display size |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 920k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony NEX-C3 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Hasselblad X1D has physical dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-C3 has dimensions of 110mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Check the Hasselblad X1D and Sony NEX-C3 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select during that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the X1D compared to the NEX-C3.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the X1D and NEX-C3 is 60 and 91 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D vs Sony NEX-C3 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to envision the difference in sensor sizes just by going through a spec sheet. The picture below will give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the X1D and NEX-C3.
Clearly, both the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The X1D having a larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Hasselblad X1D will provide greater detail having an extra 35 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics a little more aggressively. The fresher X1D is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Hasselblad X1D vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D vs Sony NEX-C3 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Hasselblad | Sony |
Model | Hasselblad X1D | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2016-06-22 | 2011-08-22 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4912 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | Sony E |
Available lenses | 4 | 121 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.3 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/2000s | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 pounds) | 225 gr (0.50 pounds) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 102 | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | 12.2 |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | 1083 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 images |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Two | One |
Pricing at launch | $6,495 | $343 |