Hasselblad X1D vs Sony NEX-F3
60 Imaging
82 Features
74 Overall
78


86 Imaging
57 Features
60 Overall
58
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony NEX-F3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Launched June 2016
- Replacement is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 314g - 117 x 67 x 42mm
- Introduced August 2012
- Older Model is Sony NEX-C3
- Newer Model is Sony NEX-3N

Hasselblad X1D vs Sony NEX-F3 Overview
Here is a extensive review of the Hasselblad X1D and Sony NEX-F3, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Hasselblad and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and NEX-F3 (16MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and NEX-F3 (APS-C) have different sensor measurements.

The X1D was unveiled 3 years later than the NEX-F3 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the X1D scores against the NEX-F3 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Hasselblad X1D vs Sony NEX-F3 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Hasselblad X1D & Sony Alpha NEX-F3. The full galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X1D Gallery & Sony NEX-F3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Sony NEX-F3
X1D | NEX-F3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2016 | ![]() | August 2012 | Fresher by 47 months |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-F3 over the Hasselblad X1D
NEX-F3 | X1D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Sony NEX-F3
X1D | NEX-F3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurements |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 920k | Equal display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony NEX-F3 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Hasselblad X1D offers exterior dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) and the Sony NEX-F3 has proportions of 117mm x 67mm x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 314 grams (0.69 lbs).
See the Hasselblad X1D and Sony NEX-F3 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the X1D and the NEX-F3.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the X1D and NEX-F3 is 60 and 86 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D vs Sony NEX-F3 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizing simply by reviewing technical specs. The visual below will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the X1D and NEX-F3.
As you have seen, both the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The X1D using its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D will offer you greater detail having an extra 35MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images way more aggressively. The fresher X1D should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

Hasselblad X1D vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D vs Sony NEX-F3 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Hasselblad | Sony |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2016-06-22 | 2012-08-16 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4912 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 16000 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Hasselblad X | Sony E |
Number of lenses | 4 | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.3fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/2000 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 pounds) | 314 gr (0.69 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 117 x 67 x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 102 | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | 12.3 |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | 1114 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 470 photographs |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Two | One |
Retail cost | $6,495 | $470 |