Hasselblad X1D vs Sony A6400
60 Imaging
82 Features
74 Overall
78
83 Imaging
69 Features
88 Overall
76
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony A6400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Released June 2016
- Renewed by Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Bump to 102400)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 403g - 120 x 67 x 50mm
- Introduced January 2019
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony A6400 Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Hasselblad X1D and Sony A6400, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Hasselblad and Sony. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and A6400 (24MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and A6400 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe X1D was launched 3 years before the A6400 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving through a full comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the X1D scores against the A6400 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony A6400 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Hasselblad X1D & Sony Alpha a6400. The complete galleries are available at Hasselblad X1D Gallery & Sony A6400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Sony A6400
X1D | A6400 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A6400 over the Hasselblad X1D
A6400 | X1D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2019 | June 2016 | More modern by 31 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 922k | 920k | Crisper display (+2k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Sony A6400
X1D | A6400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurements | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony A6400 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera, you need to factor its weight and size. The Hasselblad X1D has got outer dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) while the Sony A6400 has specifications of 120mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") along with a weight of 403 grams (0.89 lbs).
Analyze the Hasselblad X1D and Sony A6400 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the X1D versus the A6400.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the X1D and A6400 is 60 and 83 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony A6400 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to see the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the X1D and A6400.
Clearly, both the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The X1D due to its larger sensor will make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D will offer greater detail utilizing its extra 27 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more aged X1D is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony A6400 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony A6400 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D | Sony Alpha a6400 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Hasselblad | Sony |
Model | Hasselblad X1D | Sony Alpha a6400 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2016-06-22 | 2019-01-15 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 32000 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Hasselblad X | Sony E |
Total lenses | 4 | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.3 frames per second | 11.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Off, auto, on, slow sync, rear sync, redeye reduction, wireless, hi-speed sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/2000 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264, XAVC-S |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 lbs) | 403 gr (0.89 lbs) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 120 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 102 | 83 |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | 24.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | 13.6 |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | 1431 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 410 pictures |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick DUO (UHS-I compliant) |
Storage slots | Dual | Single |
Launch pricing | $6,495 | $898 |