Hasselblad X1D vs Sony FX3
60 Imaging
82 Features
74 Overall
78
62 Imaging
65 Features
92 Overall
75
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony FX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Released June 2016
- Successor is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 102400 (Expand to 409600)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 716g - 130 x 78 x 85mm
- Released February 2021
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony FX3 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Hasselblad X1D versus Sony FX3, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras by competitors Hasselblad and Sony. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and FX3 (12MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and FX3 (Full frame) posses different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe X1D was manufactured 5 years prior to the FX3 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a brief overview of how the X1D grades versus the FX3 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony FX3 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Hasselblad X1D and Sony FX3. The entire galleries are available at Hasselblad X1D Gallery and Sony FX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Sony FX3
X1D | FX3 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony FX3 over the Hasselblad X1D
FX3 | X1D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2021 | June 2016 | Fresher by 56 months | |
Display type | Fully articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1440k | 920k | Clearer display (+520k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Sony FX3
X1D | FX3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display size | 3" | 3.00" | Same display sizing | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony FX3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and size. The Hasselblad X1D features outside dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Sony FX3 has specifications of 130mm x 78mm x 85mm (5.1" x 3.1" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 716 grams (1.58 lbs).
Compare the Hasselblad X1D versus Sony FX3 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the X1D compared to the FX3.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the X1D and FX3 is 60 and 62 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony FX3 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizing purely by reading through specs. The photograph below will offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the X1D and FX3.
All in all, both the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The X1D featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh easier and the Hasselblad X1D will give greater detail due to its extra 39 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older X1D is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony FX3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony FX3 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D | Sony FX3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Hasselblad | Sony |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D | Sony FX3 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Released | 2016-06-22 | 2021-02-23 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 35.6 x 23.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 847.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4240 x 2832 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 102400 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 409600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 759 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Hasselblad X | Sony E |
Available lenses | 4 | 187 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully articulated |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3.00 inches |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 1,440 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.3 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/2000 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | 3840 x 2160 @ 120p / 280 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 @ 100p / 280 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 200 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 @ 50p / 200 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 140 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 140 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 @ 100p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, XAVC S, XAVC HS, XAVC S-1, H.264, H.265 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725g (1.60 lb) | 716g (1.58 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 130 x 78 x 85mm (5.1" x 3.1" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 102 | 85 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | 24.2 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | 13.4 |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | 3900 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 600 shots |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FZ100 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures)) |
Time lapse feature | With downloadable app | |
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | Dual SD/CFexpress Type A slots |
Card slots | 2 | 2 |
Pricing at launch | $6,495 | $3,900 |