Hasselblad X1D vs Sony ZV-E10
60 Imaging
82 Features
74 Overall
78
86 Imaging
71 Features
92 Overall
79
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony ZV-E10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Announced June 2016
- Replacement is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Bump to 51200)
- 3840 x 1920 video
- Sony E Mount
- 343g - 115 x 64 x 45mm
- Revealed July 2021
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony ZV-E10 Overview
In this write-up, we are looking at the Hasselblad X1D versus Sony ZV-E10, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Hasselblad and Sony. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and ZV-E10 (24MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and ZV-E10 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe X1D was released 6 years prior to the ZV-E10 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a short summation of how the X1D grades versus the ZV-E10 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony ZV-E10 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Hasselblad X1D and Sony ZV-E10. The complete galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X1D Gallery and Sony ZV-E10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Sony ZV-E10
X1D | ZV-E10 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony ZV-E10 over the Hasselblad X1D
ZV-E10 | X1D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2021 | June 2016 | Newer by 62 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Sony ZV-E10
X1D | ZV-E10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement | |
Display resolution | 920k | 920k | The same display resolution | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony ZV-E10 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Hasselblad X1D features physical dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Sony ZV-E10 has specifications of 115mm x 64mm x 45mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.8") along with a weight of 343 grams (0.76 lbs).
Contrast the Hasselblad X1D versus Sony ZV-E10 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the X1D vs the ZV-E10.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the X1D and ZV-E10 is 60 and 86 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony ZV-E10 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to see the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reading specs. The pic below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the X1D and ZV-E10.
As you can plainly see, both cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The X1D due to its larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D will offer you extra detail as a result of its extra 27MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images a little more aggressively. The more aged X1D is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony ZV-E10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony ZV-E10 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D | Sony ZV-E10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Hasselblad | Sony |
Model | Hasselblad X1D | Sony ZV-E10 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2016-06-22 | 2021-07-30 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 32000 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 51200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Hasselblad X | Sony E |
Amount of lenses | 4 | 150 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 920k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.3 frames per sec | 11.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/2000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | 3840 x 1920 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 1920 @ 25p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 100p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x1920 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, XAVC S, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 lb) | 343 gr (0.76 lb) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 115 x 64 x 45mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 440 images |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | Dual | 1 |
Cost at launch | $6,495 | $699 |