Hasselblad X2D vs OM System OM-1
56 Imaging
93 Features
78 Overall
87
65 Imaging
63 Features
96 Overall
76
Hasselblad X2D vs OM System OM-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 100MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Tilting Display
- ISO 64 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 895g - 149 x 106 x 75mm
- Launched September 2022
- Old Model is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600 (Increase to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 599g - 135 x 92 x 73mm
- Released February 2022
Hasselblad X2D vs OM System OM-1 Overview
Below, we are matching up the Hasselblad X2D and OM System OM-1, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by brands Hasselblad and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the X2D (100MP) and OM System OM-1 (20MP) and the X2D (Medium format) and OM System OM-1 (Four Thirds) feature totally different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe X2D was released 7 months later than the OM System OM-1 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Hasselblad X2D being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the OM System OM-1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a short overview of how the X2D scores against the OM System OM-1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Hasselblad X2D vs OM System OM-1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Hasselblad X2D 100c and OM System OM-1. The complete galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X2D Gallery and OM System OM-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X2D over the OM System OM-1
X2D | OM System OM-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2022 | February 2022 | More recent by 7 months | |
Display dimension | 3.60" | 3.00" | Larger display (+0.6") | |
Display resolution | 2360k | 1620k | Clearer display (+740k dot) |
Reasons to pick OM System OM-1 over the Hasselblad X2D
OM System OM-1 | X2D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Hasselblad X2D and OM System OM-1
X2D | OM System OM-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Hasselblad X2D vs OM System OM-1 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Hasselblad X2D has got physical dimensions of 149mm x 106mm x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs) whilst the OM System OM-1 has sizing of 135mm x 92mm x 73mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.9") with a weight of 599 grams (1.32 lbs).
Check out the Hasselblad X2D and OM System OM-1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the X2D and the OM System OM-1.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the X2D and OM System OM-1 is 56 and 65 respectively.
Hasselblad X2D vs OM System OM-1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to visualise the difference in sensor measurements simply by checking out specifications. The visual underneath will provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the X2D and OM System OM-1.
Plainly, the 2 cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The X2D featuring a larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Hasselblad X2D will show greater detail as a result of its extra 80 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images much more aggressively. The newer X2D is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Hasselblad X2D vs OM System OM-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X2D vs OM System OM-1 Specifications
Hasselblad X2D 100c | OM System OM-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Hasselblad | Olympus |
Model | Hasselblad X2D 100c | OM System OM-1 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Launched | 2022-09-07 | 2022-02-15 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | Stacked BSI Live MOS Sensor |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 100MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 11656 x 8742 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 294 | 1053 |
Cross focus points | - | 1053 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 13 | 118 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3.60 inch | 3.00 inch |
Display resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 1,620 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760 thousand dots | 5,760 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | 0.83x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4080 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/6000 secs | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.3 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | TTL center weighted system, compatible with Nikon System Flashes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/4000 secs | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Max video resolution | - | 4096x2160 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265, HEVC |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 895g (1.97 lbs) | 599g (1.32 lbs) |
Dimensions | 149 x 106 x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") | 135 x 92 x 73mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 pictures | 520 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLX-1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | CFexpress Type B, 1TB Internal Storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) |
Card slots | One | Dual |
Price at launch | $8,199 | $2,199 |