Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-M1
56 Imaging
92 Features
78 Overall
86
71 Imaging
53 Features
85 Overall
65
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 100MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Tilting Screen
- ISO 64 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 895g - 149 x 106 x 75mm
- Launched September 2022
- Replaced the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Released October 2013
- New Model is Olympus E-M1 II
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-M1 Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Hasselblad X2D and Olympus E-M1, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras by companies Hasselblad and Olympus. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the X2D (100MP) and E-M1 (16MP) and the X2D (Medium format) and E-M1 (Four Thirds) posses different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe X2D was brought out 8 years later than the E-M1 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Hasselblad X2D being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight to a complete comparison, here is a simple view of how the X2D grades vs the E-M1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-M1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Hasselblad X2D 100c & Olympus OM-D E-M1. The entire galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X2D Gallery & Olympus E-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X2D over the Olympus E-M1
X2D | E-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2022 | October 2013 | Fresher by 108 months | |
Screen size | 3.60" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
Screen resolution | 2360k | 1037k | Clearer screen (+1323k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Hasselblad X2D
E-M1 | X2D |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X2D and Olympus E-M1
X2D | E-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-M1 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The Hasselblad X2D features physical dimensions of 149mm x 106mm x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs) and the Olympus E-M1 has sizing of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") having a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs).
Compare the Hasselblad X2D and Olympus E-M1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select during that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the X2D compared to the E-M1.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the X2D and E-M1 is 56 and 71 respectively.
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-M1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizing simply by looking at technical specs. The photograph here should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the X2D and E-M1.
As you can tell, each of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The X2D because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF easier and the Hasselblad X2D will give you extra detail having its extra 84MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs way more aggressively. The fresher X2D provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-M1 Specifications
Hasselblad X2D 100c | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Hasselblad | Olympus |
Model | Hasselblad X2D 100c | Olympus OM-D E-M1 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Launched | 2022-09-07 | 2013-10-28 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePIC VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 100 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 11656 x 8742 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 294 | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 13 | 107 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3.60 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 2,360k dot | 1,037k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760k dot | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4080 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/6000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.3 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | TTL center weighted system, compatible with Nikon System Flashes | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/4000 secs | 1/320 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | - | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 895g (1.97 lb) | 497g (1.10 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 149 x 106 x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 757 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 images | 350 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLN-1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | CFexpress Type B, 1TB Internal Storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $8,199 | $799 |