Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-M1 II
56 Imaging
93 Features
78 Overall
87
68 Imaging
60 Features
93 Overall
73
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-M1 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 100MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Tilting Display
- ISO 64 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 895g - 149 x 106 x 75mm
- Introduced September 2022
- Succeeded the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Released September 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M1 III
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-M1 II Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Hasselblad X2D versus Olympus E-M1 II, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by manufacturers Hasselblad and Olympus. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the X2D (100MP) and E-M1 II (20MP) and the X2D (Medium format) and E-M1 II (Four Thirds) boast different sensor size.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsThe X2D was unveiled 6 years later than the E-M1 II and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Hasselblad X2D being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the X2D grades vs the E-M1 II with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-M1 II Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Hasselblad X2D 100c and Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II. The full galleries are provided at Hasselblad X2D Gallery and Olympus E-M1 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X2D over the Olympus E-M1 II
| X2D | E-M1 II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2022 |  | September 2016 | More recent by 73 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3.60" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.6") |
| Screen resolution | 2360k |  | 1037k | Clearer screen (+1323k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Hasselblad X2D
| E-M1 II | X2D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Common features in the Hasselblad X2D and Olympus E-M1 II
| X2D | E-M1 II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-M1 II Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Hasselblad X2D provides physical measurements of 149mm x 106mm x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") having a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M1 II has dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs).
Compare the Hasselblad X2D versus Olympus E-M1 II in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the X2D against the E-M1 II.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the X2D and E-M1 II is 56 and 68 respectively.
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-M1 II Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements purely by looking through technical specs. The graphic here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the X2D and E-M1 II.
As you have seen, the two cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The X2D having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Hasselblad X2D will provide you with extra detail having an extra 80MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more recent X2D provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-M1 II Specifications
| Hasselblad X2D 100c | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Hasselblad | Olympus |
| Model type | Hasselblad X2D 100c | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2022-09-07 | 2016-09-19 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 226.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 100 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 11656 x 8742 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 200 |
| RAW images | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | - | 64 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 294 | 121 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
| Total lenses | 13 | 107 |
| Crop factor | 0.8 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
| Display size | 3.60 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 5,760 thousand dots | 2,360 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4080s | 60s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
| Max quiet shutter speed | 1/6000s | 1/32000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.3fps | 60.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | TTL center weighted system, compatible with Nikon System Flashes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/4000s | 1/250s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | - | 4096x2160 |
| Video data format | - | MOV, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 895 grams (1.97 pounds) | 574 grams (1.27 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 149 x 106 x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 80 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.8 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1312 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 420 photos | 350 photos |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | BLH-1 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | CFexpress Type B, 1TB Internal Storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
| Card slots | One | Dual |
| Price at release | $8,199 | $1,700 |
