Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-PL1
56 Imaging
91 Features
78 Overall
85
86 Imaging
46 Features
43 Overall
44
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-PL1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 100MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Tilting Display
- ISO 64 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 895g - 149 x 106 x 75mm
- Released September 2022
- Old Model is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Released May 2010
- Successor is Olympus E-PL1s
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-PL1 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-PL1, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Hasselblad and Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the X2D (100MP) and E-PL1 (12MP) and the X2D (Medium format) and E-PL1 (Four Thirds) have different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe X2D was released 12 years later than the E-PL1 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the X2D matches up vs the E-PL1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-PL1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Hasselblad X2D 100c & Olympus PEN E-PL1. The complete galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X2D Gallery & Olympus E-PL1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X2D over the Olympus E-PL1
| X2D | E-PL1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2022 | May 2010 | Fresher by 150 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display dimensions | 3.60" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.9") | |
| Display resolution | 2360k | 230k | Sharper display (+2130k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1 over the Hasselblad X2D
| E-PL1 | X2D |
|---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X2D and Olympus E-PL1
| X2D | E-PL1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-PL1 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Hasselblad X2D offers exterior dimensions of 149mm x 106mm x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") having a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs) while the Olympus E-PL1 has specifications of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs).
Check the Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-PL1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the X2D compared to the E-PL1.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the X2D and E-PL1 is 56 and 86 respectively.
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-PL1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to picture the gap in sensor sizing merely by looking through specifications. The visual underneath will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the X2D and E-PL1.
To sum up, each of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The X2D featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Hasselblad X2D will render more detail as a result of its extra 88 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos more aggressively. The fresher X2D should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-PL1 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-PL1 Specifications
| Hasselblad X2D 100c | Olympus PEN E-PL1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Hasselblad | Olympus |
| Model | Hasselblad X2D 100c | Olympus PEN E-PL1 |
| Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Released | 2022-09-07 | 2010-05-17 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Truepic V |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 100 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 11656 x 8742 | 4032 x 3024 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 294 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
| Amount of lenses | 13 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3.60 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 2,360 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | - | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 5,760 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4080s | 60s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Max quiet shutter speed | 1/6000s | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.3 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 10.00 m |
| Flash modes | TTL center weighted system, compatible with Nikon System Flashes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/4000s | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | - | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 895 grams (1.97 pounds) | 334 grams (0.74 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 149 x 106 x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 54 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.1 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 487 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 420 images | 290 images |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | BLS-1 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | CFexpress Type B, 1TB Internal Storage | SD/SDHC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $8,199 | $288 |