Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-PL9
56 Imaging
91 Features
78 Overall
85
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-PL9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 100MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Tilting Display
- ISO 64 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 895g - 149 x 106 x 75mm
- Introduced September 2022
- Succeeded the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Boost to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Revealed February 2018
- Older Model is Olympus E-PL8
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-PL9 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Hasselblad X2D versus Olympus E-PL9, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Hasselblad and Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the X2D (100MP) and E-PL9 (16MP) and the X2D (Medium format) and E-PL9 (Four Thirds) posses different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe X2D was released 4 years later than the E-PL9 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the X2D scores versus the E-PL9 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-PL9 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Hasselblad X2D 100c & Olympus PEN E-PL9. The complete galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X2D Gallery & Olympus E-PL9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X2D over the Olympus E-PL9
| X2D | E-PL9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2022 | February 2018 | Fresher by 56 months | |
| Display size | 3.60" | 3" | Larger display (+0.6") | |
| Display resolution | 2360k | 1040k | Sharper display (+1320k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Hasselblad X2D
| E-PL9 | X2D |
|---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X2D and Olympus E-PL9
| X2D | E-PL9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-PL9 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Hasselblad X2D enjoys outer measurements of 149mm x 106mm x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") with a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PL9 has proportions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs).
Compare the Hasselblad X2D versus Olympus E-PL9 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at that moment. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the X2D against the E-PL9.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the X2D and E-PL9 is 56 and 85 respectively.
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-PL9 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizing simply by looking at technical specs. The photograph here will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the X2D and E-PL9.
As you have seen, both of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The X2D featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Hasselblad X2D will resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 84MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics way more aggressively. The more modern X2D should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-PL9 Specifications
| Hasselblad X2D 100c | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Hasselblad | Olympus |
| Model type | Hasselblad X2D 100c | Olympus PEN E-PL9 |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2022-09-07 | 2018-02-08 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 100 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 11656 x 8742 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 200 |
| RAW format | ||
| Min boosted ISO | - | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 294 | 121 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
| Number of lenses | 13 | 107 |
| Crop factor | 0.8 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Tilting | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 3.60 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 2,360 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 5,760 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4080 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/6000 seconds | 1/16000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.3fps | 8.6fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) |
| Flash settings | TTL center weighted system, compatible with Nikon System Flashes | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/4000 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | - | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 895 gr (1.97 lbs) | 380 gr (0.84 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 149 x 106 x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 420 pictures | 350 pictures |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | CFexpress Type B, 1TB Internal Storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $8,199 | $599 |