Hasselblad X2D vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
56 Imaging
92 Features
78 Overall
86


77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Hasselblad X2D vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 100MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Tilting Display
- ISO 64 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 895g - 149 x 106 x 75mm
- Launched September 2022
- Old Model is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Revealed November 2009

Hasselblad X2D vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
The following is a extensive assessment of the Hasselblad X2D vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Hasselblad and Ricoh. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the X2D (100MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the X2D (Medium format) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) use different sensor sizing.

The X2D was released 13 years after the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the X2D grades vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Hasselblad X2D vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Hasselblad X2D 100c & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The complete galleries are available at Hasselblad X2D Gallery & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X2D over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
X2D | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2022 | ![]() | November 2009 | Newer by 157 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimension | 3.60" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.6") |
Screen resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 920k | Crisper screen (+1440k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Hasselblad X2D
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | X2D |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X2D and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
X2D | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
Hasselblad X2D vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera often, you need to consider its weight and size. The Hasselblad X2D features exterior measurements of 149mm x 106mm x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") with a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has specifications of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Look at the Hasselblad X2D vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the X2D versus the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the X2D and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 56 and 77 respectively.

Hasselblad X2D vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions just by looking through technical specs. The picture here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the X2D and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
As you have seen, both of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The X2D due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Hasselblad X2D will render extra detail as a result of its extra 88MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively. The more modern X2D should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.

Hasselblad X2D vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X2D vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Hasselblad X2D 100c | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Hasselblad | Ricoh |
Model | Hasselblad X2D 100c | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2022-09-07 | 2009-11-10 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 100MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 11656 x 8742 | 4288 x 2848 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 294 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 50mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 13 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3.60" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 2,360k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4080 seconds | 180 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/6000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.3fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | TTL center weighted system, compatible with Nikon System Flashes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/4000 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | - | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 895 gr (1.97 lb) | 453 gr (1.00 lb) |
Dimensions | 149 x 106 x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 photographs | 320 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | CFexpress Type B, 1TB Internal Storage | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $8,199 | $566 |