Hasselblad X2D vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12
56 Imaging
92 Features
78 Overall
86
84 Imaging
53 Features
39 Overall
47
Hasselblad X2D vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 100MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Tilting Display
- ISO 64 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 895g - 149 x 106 x 75mm
- Introduced September 2022
- Older Model is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1/9000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
- Revealed August 2011
Hasselblad X2D vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Overview
Here is a comprehensive analysis of the Hasselblad X2D versus Ricoh GXR Mount A12, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Hasselblad and Ricoh. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the X2D (100MP) and GXR Mount A12 (12MP) and the X2D (Medium format) and GXR Mount A12 (APS-C) boast different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe X2D was manufactured 11 years later than the GXR Mount A12 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the X2D grades against the GXR Mount A12 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Hasselblad X2D vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Hasselblad X2D 100c and Ricoh GXR Mount A12. The entire galleries are provided at Hasselblad X2D Gallery and Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X2D over the Ricoh GXR Mount A12
X2D | GXR Mount A12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2022 | August 2011 | Fresher by 136 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimensions | 3.60" | 3" | Larger display (+0.6") | |
Display resolution | 2360k | 920k | Sharper display (+1440k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR Mount A12 over the Hasselblad X2D
GXR Mount A12 | X2D |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X2D and Ricoh GXR Mount A12
X2D | GXR Mount A12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Hasselblad X2D vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Hasselblad X2D features exterior measurements of 149mm x 106mm x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") along with a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 has dimensions of 120mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") with a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs).
Examine the Hasselblad X2D versus Ricoh GXR Mount A12 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the X2D compared to the GXR Mount A12.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the X2D and GXR Mount A12 is 56 and 84 respectively.
Hasselblad X2D vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to picture the difference in sensor sizing purely by going through technical specs. The graphic underneath will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the X2D and GXR Mount A12.
As you have seen, both cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The X2D due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Hasselblad X2D will show greater detail due to its extra 88 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The fresher X2D provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Hasselblad X2D vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X2D vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Specifications
Hasselblad X2D 100c | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Hasselblad | Ricoh |
Model type | Hasselblad X2D 100c | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2022-09-07 | 2011-08-05 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 100 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 11656 x 8742 | 4288 x 2848 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 294 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Hasselblad X | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | () |
Available lenses | 13 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3.60 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 2,360k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4080s | 1s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/9000s |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/6000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.3fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 9.60 m |
Flash modes | TTL center weighted system, compatible with Nikon System Flashes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/4000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | - | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 895 gr (1.97 pounds) | 370 gr (0.82 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 149 x 106 x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") | 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 shots | 330 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (5 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | CFexpress Type B, 1TB Internal Storage | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $8,199 | $349 |