Hasselblad X2D vs Sony A7R IV
56 Imaging
92 Features
78 Overall
86
62 Imaging
81 Features
93 Overall
85
Hasselblad X2D vs Sony A7R IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 100MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Tilting Display
- ISO 64 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 895g - 149 x 106 x 75mm
- Introduced September 2022
- Old Model is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 61MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Push to 102800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 665g - 129 x 96 x 78mm
- Introduced July 2019
- Superseded the Sony A7R III
- Successor is Sony A7R V
Hasselblad X2D vs Sony A7R IV Overview
Following is a detailed comparison of the Hasselblad X2D vs Sony A7R IV, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by manufacturers Hasselblad and Sony. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the X2D (100MP) and A7R IV (61MP) and the X2D (Medium format) and A7R IV (Full frame) come with different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe X2D was brought out 3 years after the A7R IV which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Hasselblad X2D being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A7R IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving through a thorough comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the X2D grades against the A7R IV with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Hasselblad X2D vs Sony A7R IV Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Hasselblad X2D 100c & Sony Alpha A7R IV. The entire galleries are provided at Hasselblad X2D Gallery & Sony A7R IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X2D over the Sony A7R IV
X2D | A7R IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2022 | July 2019 | More modern by 39 months | |
Screen dimension | 3.60" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
Screen resolution | 2360k | 1440k | Sharper screen (+920k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A7R IV over the Hasselblad X2D
A7R IV | X2D |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X2D and Sony A7R IV
X2D | A7R IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Hasselblad X2D vs Sony A7R IV Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Hasselblad X2D features outside dimensions of 149mm x 106mm x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") with a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs) whilst the Sony A7R IV has measurements of 129mm x 96mm x 78mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 3.1") with a weight of 665 grams (1.47 lbs).
Compare the Hasselblad X2D vs Sony A7R IV in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the X2D and the A7R IV.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the X2D and A7R IV is 56 and 62 respectively.
Hasselblad X2D vs Sony A7R IV Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes merely by going through specs. The image below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the X2D and A7R IV.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The X2D due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Hasselblad X2D will produce more detail having its extra 39MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures much more aggressively. The more recent X2D provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Hasselblad X2D vs Sony A7R IV Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X2D vs Sony A7R IV Specifications
Hasselblad X2D 100c | Sony Alpha A7R IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Hasselblad | Sony |
Model | Hasselblad X2D 100c | Sony Alpha A7R IV |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2022-09-07 | 2019-07-16 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 35.8 x 23.8mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 852.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 100 megapixels | 61 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 11656 x 8742 | 9504 x 6336 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 32000 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 102800 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 294 | 567 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | Sony E |
Amount of lenses | 13 | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display size | 3.60 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 2,360k dots | 1,440k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760k dots | 5,760k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4080s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/6000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.3 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | TTL center weighted system, compatible with Nikon System Flashes | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync., Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync. |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/4000s | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | - | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, XAVC S, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1(5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 895g (1.97 lbs) | 665g (1.47 lbs) |
Dimensions | 149 x 106 x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") | 129 x 96 x 78mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 99 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 26.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 14.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 3344 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 shots | 670 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FZ100 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | CFexpress Type B, 1TB Internal Storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II compatible) |
Card slots | Single | Dual |
Retail price | $8,199 | $3,498 |