Hasselblad X2D vs Sony A6100
56 Imaging
92 Features
78 Overall
86


81 Imaging
69 Features
88 Overall
76
Hasselblad X2D vs Sony A6100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 100MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Tilting Screen
- ISO 64 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 895g - 149 x 106 x 75mm
- Revealed September 2022
- Earlier Model is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Push to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 396g - 120 x 67 x 59mm
- Launched August 2019

Hasselblad X2D vs Sony A6100 Overview
In this write-up, we are contrasting the Hasselblad X2D versus Sony A6100, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Hasselblad and Sony. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the X2D (100MP) and A6100 (24MP) and the X2D (Medium format) and A6100 (APS-C) come with different sensor sizes.

The X2D was launched 3 years after the A6100 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the X2D matches up versus the A6100 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Hasselblad X2D vs Sony A6100 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Hasselblad X2D 100c and Sony Alpha a6100. The complete galleries are provided at Hasselblad X2D Gallery and Sony A6100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X2D over the Sony A6100
X2D | A6100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2022 | ![]() | August 2019 | Newer by 37 months |
Display sizing | 3.60" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.6") |
Display resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 922k | Sharper display (+1438k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A6100 over the Hasselblad X2D
A6100 | X2D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Hasselblad X2D and Sony A6100
X2D | A6100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting display |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Hasselblad X2D vs Sony A6100 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Hasselblad X2D features outer dimensions of 149mm x 106mm x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") along with a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs) while the Sony A6100 has proportions of 120mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.3") with a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs).
Analyze the Hasselblad X2D versus Sony A6100 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the X2D vs the A6100.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the X2D and A6100 is 56 and 81 respectively.

Hasselblad X2D vs Sony A6100 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing specs. The image here will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the X2D and A6100.
All in all, the 2 cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The X2D featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Hasselblad X2D will offer more detail utilizing its extra 76MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The younger X2D provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.

Hasselblad X2D vs Sony A6100 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X2D vs Sony A6100 Specifications
Hasselblad X2D 100c | Sony Alpha a6100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Hasselblad | Sony |
Model type | Hasselblad X2D 100c | Sony Alpha a6100 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2022-09-07 | 2019-08-28 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 100 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 11656 x 8742 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 32000 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 294 | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Hasselblad X | Sony E |
Total lenses | 13 | 121 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen size | 3.60 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 2,360k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760k dots | 1,440k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | 0.71x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4080 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/6000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.3fps | 11.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | TTL center weighted system, compatible with Nikon System Flashes | Flash off, auto, fill flash, slow sync, rear sync, wireless, hi-speed |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/4000 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | - | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, XAVC S, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 895 gr (1.97 pounds) | 396 gr (0.87 pounds) |
Dimensions | 149 x 106 x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") | 120 x 67 x 59mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 shots | 420 shots |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | CFexpress Type B, 1TB Internal Storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $8,199 | $748 |