Hasselblad X2D vs Sony A6400
56 Imaging
92 Features
78 Overall
86


83 Imaging
69 Features
88 Overall
76
Hasselblad X2D vs Sony A6400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 100MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Tilting Screen
- ISO 64 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 895g - 149 x 106 x 75mm
- Announced September 2022
- Succeeded the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Raise to 102400)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 403g - 120 x 67 x 50mm
- Released January 2019

Hasselblad X2D vs Sony A6400 Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Hasselblad X2D versus Sony A6400, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Hasselblad and Sony. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the X2D (100MP) and A6400 (24MP) and the X2D (Medium format) and A6400 (APS-C) provide different sensor dimensions.

The X2D was announced 3 years after the A6400 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the X2D grades versus the A6400 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Hasselblad X2D vs Sony A6400 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Hasselblad X2D 100c & Sony Alpha a6400. The whole galleries are available at Hasselblad X2D Gallery & Sony A6400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X2D over the Sony A6400
X2D | A6400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2022 | ![]() | January 2019 | Newer by 45 months |
Screen size | 3.60" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.6") |
Screen resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 922k | Clearer screen (+1438k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A6400 over the Hasselblad X2D
A6400 | X2D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Hasselblad X2D and Sony A6400
X2D | A6400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting screen |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Hasselblad X2D vs Sony A6400 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Hasselblad X2D enjoys exterior dimensions of 149mm x 106mm x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs) whilst the Sony A6400 has specifications of 120mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") and a weight of 403 grams (0.89 lbs).
Take a look at the Hasselblad X2D versus Sony A6400 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using during that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the X2D compared to the A6400.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the X2D and A6400 is 56 and 83 respectively.

Hasselblad X2D vs Sony A6400 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to picture the gap between sensor dimensions merely by going over specs. The pic here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the X2D and A6400.
As you can plainly see, both cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The X2D with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Hasselblad X2D will deliver greater detail with its extra 76MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more modern X2D should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.

Hasselblad X2D vs Sony A6400 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X2D vs Sony A6400 Specifications
Hasselblad X2D 100c | Sony Alpha a6400 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Hasselblad | Sony |
Model | Hasselblad X2D 100c | Sony Alpha a6400 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2022-09-07 | 2019-01-15 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 100 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 11656 x 8742 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 32000 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 102400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 294 | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | Sony E |
Available lenses | 13 | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3.60 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 2,360k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760k dot | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4080s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/6000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.3fps | 11.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | TTL center weighted system, compatible with Nikon System Flashes | Off, auto, on, slow sync, rear sync, redeye reduction, wireless, hi-speed sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/4000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | - | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264, XAVC-S |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 895 gr (1.97 lbs) | 403 gr (0.89 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 149 x 106 x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") | 120 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 83 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1431 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 photographs | 410 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | CFexpress Type B, 1TB Internal Storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick DUO (UHS-I compliant) |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $8,199 | $898 |