Kodak C135 vs Olympus FE-5010
92 Imaging
37 Features
17 Overall
29
96 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Kodak C135 vs Olympus FE-5010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-180mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 130g - 96 x 57 x 21mm
- Announced January 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak C135 vs Olympus FE-5010 Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Kodak C135 and Olympus FE-5010, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Kodak and Olympus. The resolution of the C135 (14MP) and the FE-5010 (12MP) is very close and they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe C135 was released 3 years after the FE-5010 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the C135 matches up vs the FE-5010 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Kodak C135 vs Olympus FE-5010 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare C135 and Olympus FE-5010. The complete galleries are provided at Kodak C135 Gallery and Olympus FE-5010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Olympus FE-5010
| C135 | FE-5010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 | January 2009 | More modern by 37 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5010 over the Kodak C135
| FE-5010 | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 2.7" | 2.4" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 112k | Crisper display (+118k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak C135 and Olympus FE-5010
| C135 | FE-5010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Kodak C135 vs Olympus FE-5010 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera often, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Kodak C135 has got outer dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Olympus FE-5010 has dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak C135 and Olympus FE-5010 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the C135 and the FE-5010.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the C135 and FE-5010 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Kodak C135 vs Olympus FE-5010 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizes simply by viewing specs. The image underneath should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the C135 and FE-5010.
All in all, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Kodak C135 to result in extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The fresher C135 will have a benefit in sensor tech.
Kodak C135 vs Olympus FE-5010 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Kodak C135 vs Olympus FE-5010 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C135 | Olympus FE-5010 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare C135 | Olympus FE-5010 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2009-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1250 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35mm (1x) | 36-180mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.4" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 112 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 175 gr (0.39 lb) | 130 gr (0.29 lb) |
| Dimensions | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 96 x 57 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 2 x AA | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | xD-Picture Card (1GB, 2GB), microSD (MASD-1 is required) |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $0 | $130 |