Kodak C135 vs Olympus SP-565UZ
92 Imaging
37 Features
17 Overall
29
72 Imaging
32 Features
32 Overall
32
Kodak C135 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Released January 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Kodak C135 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Kodak C135 versus Olympus SP-565UZ, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the C135 (14MP) and SP-565UZ (10MP) but they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe C135 was manufactured 3 years after the SP-565UZ which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a quick overview of how the C135 scores vs the SP-565UZ in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Kodak C135 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare C135 and Olympus SP-565UZ. The entire galleries are viewable at Kodak C135 Gallery and Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| C135 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 | January 2009 | Newer by 37 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Kodak C135
| SP-565UZ | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Screen dimension | 2.5" | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.1") | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 112k | Clearer screen (+118k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak C135 and Olympus SP-565UZ
| C135 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Kodak C135 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Kodak C135 provides physical dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Olympus SP-565UZ has sizing of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Analyze the Kodak C135 versus Olympus SP-565UZ in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select at that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the C135 versus the SP-565UZ.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the C135 and SP-565UZ is 92 and 72 respectively.
Kodak C135 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The image below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the C135 and SP-565UZ.
As you can see, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You should expect the Kodak C135 to offer greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The newer C135 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Kodak C135 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Kodak C135 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C135 | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare C135 | Olympus SP-565UZ |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2009-01-15 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1250 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 143 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35mm (1x) | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0 | f/2.8-4.5 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.4 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 112 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 1 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30fps) | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 175 grams (0.39 pounds) | 413 grams (0.91 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 30 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 18.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.1 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 68 |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 2 x AA | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | xD Picture Card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $0 | $400 |