Kodak C135 vs Olympus 550WP
92 Imaging
37 Features
17 Overall
29
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
Kodak C135 vs Olympus 550WP Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-5.0) lens
- 167g - 94 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Additionally Known as mju 550WP
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Kodak C135 vs Olympus 550WP Overview
In this write-up, we are contrasting the Kodak C135 versus Olympus 550WP, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Kodak and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the C135 (14MP) and 550WP (10MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe C135 was revealed 3 years later than the 550WP and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the C135 scores versus the 550WP with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Kodak C135 vs Olympus 550WP Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare C135 & Olympus Stylus 550WP. The full galleries are viewable at Kodak C135 Gallery & Olympus 550WP Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Olympus 550WP
| C135 | 550WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 | January 2009 | More recent by 37 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus 550WP over the Kodak C135
| 550WP | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 2.5" | 2.4" | Larger display (+0.1") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 112k | Clearer display (+118k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak C135 and Olympus 550WP
| C135 | 550WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither has Touch display |
Kodak C135 vs Olympus 550WP Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Kodak C135 has external measurements of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Olympus 550WP has proportions of 94mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Kodak C135 versus Olympus 550WP in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the C135 vs the 550WP.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the C135 and 550WP is 92 and 94 respectively.
Kodak C135 vs Olympus 550WP Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to envision the difference between sensor measurements merely by reviewing specifications. The photograph here will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the C135 and 550WP.
To sum up, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Kodak C135 to offer greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics far more aggressively. The fresher C135 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Kodak C135 vs Olympus 550WP Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Kodak C135 vs Olympus 550WP Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C135 | Olympus Stylus 550WP | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare C135 | Olympus Stylus 550WP |
| Also Known as | - | mju 550WP |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2012-01-10 | 2009-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1250 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35mm (1x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0 | f/3.5-5.0 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 7cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.4 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 112 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/1000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 175 grams (0.39 pounds) | 167 grams (0.37 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 94 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $0 | $399 |