Clicky

Kodak C135 vs Olympus 6020

Portability
92
Imaging
37
Features
17
Overall
29
Kodak EasyShare C135 front
 
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 front
Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
32
Overall
33

Kodak C135 vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs

Kodak C135
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.4" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1250
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35mm (F3.0) lens
  • 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
  • Launched January 2012
Olympus 6020
(Full Review)
  • 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
  • Announced February 2010
  • Also Known as mju Tough 6020
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Kodak C135 vs Olympus 6020 Overview

Here is a complete analysis of the Kodak C135 and Olympus 6020, both Waterproof cameras by companies Kodak and Olympus. The image resolution of the C135 (14MP) and the 6020 (13MP) is very close and both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The C135 was announced 24 months later than the 6020 making them a generation apart from each other. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before diving into a thorough comparison, here is a simple summation of how the C135 matches up against the 6020 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary

        

Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Olympus 6020

 C135 6020 
AnnouncedJanuary 2012February 2010Fresher by 24 months

Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Kodak C135

 6020 C135 
Display size2.7"2.4"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution230k112kClearer display (+118k dot)

Common features in the Kodak C135 and Olympus 6020

 C135 6020 
Manually focus No manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly display No Touch friendly display

Kodak C135 vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Kodak C135 enjoys outer dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Olympus 6020 has dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).

See the Kodak C135 and Olympus 6020 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the C135 compared to the 6020.

Kodak C135 vs Olympus 6020 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the C135 and 6020 is 92 and 95 respectively.

Kodak C135 vs Olympus 6020 top view buttons comparison

Kodak C135 vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison

Often, its tough to picture the difference in sensor sizing purely by researching specs. The visual underneath may give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the C135 and 6020.

All in all, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size but different resolution. You should expect to see the Kodak C135 to provide you with greater detail with its extra 1MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The younger C135 should have an advantage in sensor innovation.

Kodak C135 vs Olympus 6020 sensor size comparison

Kodak C135 vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak C135 vs Olympus 6020 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Kodak C135
Portrait photography with Olympus 6020
33
good resolution (14MP)
features face detection focus
no manual focus
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
27
decent sensor resolution (13 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Kodak C135 Street photography advice
Olympus 6020 Street photography advice
53
weather proof
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
low maximum ISO (1,250)
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
lighter than others (122 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Kodak C135 Sports photography details
Olympus 6020 Sports photography details
31
good resolution (14 megapixels)
weather proof
fixed focal length (35mm)
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
42
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (13 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
weather sealing
painfully slow continuous shooting (5.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Kodak C135 Travel photography details
Olympus 6020 Travel photography details
64
weather proof
good resolution (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
doesn't have Time Lapse function
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.0)
70
lighter than others (122 grams)
weather sealing
decent sensor resolution (13 megapixels)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Kodak C135
Landscape photography with Olympus 6020
31
good resolution (14 megapixels)
weather proof
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
screen is somewhat small (2.4")
lack of manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
low maximum ISO (1,250)
lacks RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse function
40
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (13 megapixels)
weather sealing
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
small screen (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not available
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak C135 Vlogging advice
Olympus 6020 Vlogging advice
25
features face detection focus
slow max aperture (f3.0)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external mic support
31
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (122g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external microphone port
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Kodak C135 vs Olympus 6020 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak C135 and Olympus 6020
 Kodak EasyShare C135Olympus Stylus Tough 6020
General Information
Brand Kodak Olympus
Model Kodak EasyShare C135 Olympus Stylus Tough 6020
Also called as - mju Tough 6020
Category Waterproof Waterproof
Launched 2012-01-10 2010-02-02
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 13MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4288 x 3216 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 1250 1600
Minimum native ISO 80 64
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35mm (1x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Max aperture f/3.0 f/3.9-5.9
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.4 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 112k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 secs 1/4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/1400 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed - 5.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) 4.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 175g (0.39 lb) 122g (0.27 lb)
Physical dimensions 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model 2 x AA Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 seconds)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $0 $279