Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS
92 Imaging
37 Features
17 Overall
29
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Released January 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Overview
The following is a in depth analysis of the Kodak C135 versus Olympus TG-850 iHS, both Waterproof digital cameras by rivals Kodak and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the C135 (14MP) and the TG-850 iHS (16MP) is relatively similar and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe C135 was released 3 years before the TG-850 iHS which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the C135 grades against the TG-850 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare C135 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS. The complete galleries are viewable at Kodak C135 Gallery & Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
| C135 | TG-850 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Kodak C135
| TG-850 iHS | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 |  | January 2012 | Newer by 25 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.6") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 112k | Clearer screen (+348k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak C135 and Olympus TG-850 iHS
| C135 | TG-850 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither has Touch screen |
Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Kodak C135 has outside dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Olympus TG-850 iHS has dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Compare the Kodak C135 versus Olympus TG-850 iHS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the C135 versus the TG-850 iHS.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the C135 and TG-850 iHS is 92 and 91 respectively.
Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by going over technical specs. The picture below may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the C135 and TG-850 iHS.
As you can tell, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Olympus TG-850 iHS to offer you more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged C135 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C135 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare C135 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS |
| Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2012-01-10 | 2014-01-29 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4616 x 3464 |
| Highest native ISO | 1250 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35mm (1x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0 | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 2.4 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 112 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 1/2 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 7.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 175g (0.39 lbs) | 218g (0.48 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 photos |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $0 | $250 |