Clicky

Kodak C135 vs Olympus XZ-10

Portability
92
Imaging
37
Features
17
Overall
29
Kodak EasyShare C135 front
 
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front
Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
57
Overall
44

Kodak C135 vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs

Kodak C135
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.4" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1250
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35mm (F3.0) lens
  • 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
  • Released January 2012
Olympus XZ-10
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
  • 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
  • Launched January 2013
Photography Glossary

Kodak C135 vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview

Below is a complete analysis of the Kodak C135 versus Olympus XZ-10, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Kodak and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the C135 (14MP) and the XZ-10 (12MP) is very close and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The C135 was brought out 12 months prior to the XZ-10 so they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick summation of how the C135 grades vs the XZ-10 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Olympus XZ-10

 C135 XZ-10 

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Kodak C135

 XZ-10 C135 
LaunchedJanuary 2013January 2012More recent by 12 months
Manual focus Very precise focusing
Display size3"2.4"Larger display (+0.6")
Display resolution920k112kClearer display (+808k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Kodak C135 and Olympus XZ-10

 C135 XZ-10 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Kodak C135 vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Kodak C135 enjoys external measurements of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-10 has sizing of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).

Check out the Kodak C135 versus Olympus XZ-10 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at that moment. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the C135 versus the XZ-10.

Kodak C135 vs Olympus XZ-10 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the C135 and XZ-10 is 92 and 91 respectively.

Kodak C135 vs Olympus XZ-10 top view buttons comparison

Kodak C135 vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison

Often, its difficult to visualize the difference in sensor measurements merely by looking through specs. The photograph below may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the C135 and XZ-10.

As you can plainly see, both cameras come with the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Kodak C135 to render extra detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older C135 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Kodak C135 vs Olympus XZ-10 sensor size comparison

Kodak C135 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak C135 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak C135 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus XZ-10 as a Portrait photography camera
33
decent megapixels (14MP)
offers face detect focusing
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
45
you can focus manually
supports face detect focus
delivers RAW files
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Kodak C135 as a Street photography camera
Olympus XZ-10 as a Street photography camera
53
environment sealing
fixed screen
no image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
max ISO too low (1,250)
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
heavier than competitors in class (221g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Kodak C135
Sports photography with Olympus XZ-10
31
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
environment sealing
can't change focal length (35mm)
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400s)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
34
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports tracking focus
max frames per second low (5.0 frames per second)
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Kodak C135 Travel photography features
Olympus XZ-10 Travel photography features
64
environment sealing
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
missing Timelapse function
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
60
has built in flash
pretty wide (26mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
no Time Lapse function
heavier than competitors in class (221 grams)
MP count low (12MP)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Kodak C135 Landscape photography details
Olympus XZ-10 Landscape photography details
31
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
environment sealing
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen is somewhat small (2.4 inch)
lack of manual mode
no image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (1,250)
no RAW format
missing Timelapse function
53
you can focus manually
pretty wide (26mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no Time Lapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak C135 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus XZ-10 as a Vlogging camera
25
offers face detect focusing
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
missing microphone socket
35
pretty wide (26mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
touchscreen functionality
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
no mic support
heavier than competitors in class (221 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Kodak C135 vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak C135 and Olympus XZ-10
 Kodak EasyShare C135Olympus Stylus XZ-10
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Olympus
Model Kodak EasyShare C135 Olympus Stylus XZ-10
Type Waterproof Small Sensor Compact
Released 2012-01-10 2013-01-30
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4288 x 3216 3968 x 2976
Highest native ISO 1250 6400
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points - 35
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35mm (1x) 26-130mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.0 f/1.8-2.7
Macro focus range - 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.4 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 112 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 seconds 30 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/1400 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate - 5.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 175 gr (0.39 pounds) 221 gr (0.49 pounds)
Physical dimensions 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 240 photographs
Battery style - Battery Pack
Battery model 2 x AA Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Price at release $0 $428