Clicky

Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-310

Portability
92 Imaging
37 Features
17 Overall
29
Kodak EasyShare C135 front
 
Olympus TG-310 front
Portability
94 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34

Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs

Kodak C135
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.4" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1250
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35mm (F3.0) lens
  • 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
  • Released January 2012
Olympus TG-310
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Introduced January 2011
Photography Glossary

Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview

Below is a in depth comparison of the Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-310, both Waterproof cameras by companies Kodak and Olympus. The resolution of the C135 (14MP) and the TG-310 (14MP) is very close and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The C135 was unveiled 13 months later than the TG-310 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before going through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short view of how the C135 grades vs the TG-310 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month 

        

          

            
Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Olympus TG-310

          

          

            
 C135 TG-310 
IntroducedJanuary 2012January 2011More recent by 13 months
          

        


        

          

            
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Kodak C135

          

          

            
 TG-310 C135 
Display sizing2.7"2.4"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution230k112kClearer display (+118k dot)
          

        


        

          

            
Common features in the Kodak C135 and Olympus TG-310

          

          

            
 C135 TG-310 
Focus manually  Lack of manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen  Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch friendly display  Missing Touch friendly display
          

        

        

	
	
	
	

        

          

            
Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison

          

          

            
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Kodak C135 comes with outer dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Olympus TG-310 has sizing of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-310 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the C135 versus the TG-310.
Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-310 size comparison
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the C135 and TG-310 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-310 top view buttons comparison          

        


        

          

            
Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison

          

          

            
Quite often, it is tough to see the gap in sensor measurements merely by viewing specs. The visual underneath might give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the C135 and TG-310.
All in all, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same resolution so you can expect comparable quality of photographs although you should consider the age  of the cameras into account. The younger C135 will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

            Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-310 sensor size comparison
          

        


        

          

            
Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder

          

          

                      

          Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison        


                Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes        

	
	
	
	

        

          
Photography Type Scores

          

        

        
Portrait Comparison
Kodak C135 Portrait photography advice
Olympus TG-310 Portrait photography advice
33
 sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
 features face detection focus
 lack of manual focus
 manual mode not available
 external flash not possible
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW support
33
 resolution is good (14 megapixels)
 provides face detection focusing
 focusing manually not possible
 manual mode not possible
 no external flash support
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW files
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Street Comparison
Kodak C135 Street photography info
Olympus TG-310 Street photography info
53
 weather sealing
 fixed screen
 does not have image stabilization
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW support
 low max ISO (1,250)
66
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 weather proof
 lighter than competition (155 grams)
 screen does not articulate
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Sports Comparison
 Kodak C135 as a Sports photography camera
 Olympus TG-310 as a Sports photography camera
31
 sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
 weather sealing
 can't change focal length (35mm)
 maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400 seconds)
 lack of shutter priority mode
 does not have image stabilization
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lack of phase detect auto focus
40
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 resolution is good (14 megapixels)
 provides tracking autofocus
 weather proof
 slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
 no shutter priority mode
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 not so great battery pack (150 CIPA)
 doesn't have phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Travel Comparison
 Kodak C135 as a Travel photography camera
 Olympus TG-310 as a Travel photography camera
64
 weather sealing
 sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
 flash built-in
 no Time Lapse recording
 does not have selfie friendly screen
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
67
 lighter than competition (155g)
 weather proof
 resolution is good (14MP)
 has built in flash
 fairly wide (28mm)
 no Time Lapse recording
 not so great battery pack (150 per charge)
 does not have selfie friendly display
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Landscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Kodak C135
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-310
31
 sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
 weather sealing
 lack of manual focus
 cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
 can't change focal length (35mm)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
 small screen (2.4 inch)
 manual mode not available
 does not have image stabilization
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 low max ISO (1,250)
 lack of RAW support
 no Time Lapse recording
39
 fairly wide (28mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 resolution is good (14 megapixels)
 weather proof
 focusing manually not possible
 can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
 small screen (2.7 inches)
 manual mode not possible
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW files
 not so great battery pack (150 CIPA)
 no Time Lapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak C135 Vlogging features
Olympus TG-310 Vlogging features
25
 features face detection focus
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
 does not have selfie friendly screen
 does not have image stabilization
 low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
 no external mic port
32
 fairly wide (28mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 provides face detection focusing
 lighter than competition (155g)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
 does not have selfie friendly display
 video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
 no external mic port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
        
                
        

          

            
Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications

          

          

                      


          

            Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak C135 and Olympus TG-310
 Kodak EasyShare C135Olympus TG-310
General Information
Company Kodak Olympus
Model type Kodak EasyShare C135 Olympus TG-310
Type Waterproof Waterproof
Released 2012-01-10 2011-01-06
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic III+
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 14MP
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 -
Highest Possible resolution 4288 x 3216 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 1250 1600
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW support    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Touch focus    
AF continuous    
AF single    
Tracking AF    
AF selectice    
AF center weighted    
Multi area AF    
Live view AF    
Face detect AF    
Contract detect AF    
Phase detect AF    
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 35mm (1x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Highest aperture f/3.0 f/3.9-5.9
Macro focusing range - 3cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.4" 2.7"
Resolution of display 112 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch capability    
Display technology TFT color LCD TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 8s 4s
Max shutter speed 1/1400s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed - 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manual exposure    
Change WB    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash distance 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) 4.20 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe    
AEB    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment exposure    
Average exposure    
Spot exposure    
Partial exposure    
AF area exposure    
Center weighted exposure    
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack    
Headphone jack    
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 175g (0.39 pounds) 155g (0.34 pounds)
Dimensions 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 150 pictures
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID 2 x AA LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature    
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at release $0 $0