Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
92 Imaging
37 Features
17 Overall
29
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Announced June 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
Here is a extended assessment of the Kodak C135 and Olympus TG-2 iHS, both Waterproof cameras by companies Kodak and Olympus. The resolution of the C135 (14MP) and the TG-2 iHS (12MP) is very comparable and they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe C135 was manufactured 17 months before the TG-2 iHS making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief overview of how the C135 matches up versus the TG-2 iHS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare C135 & Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The entire galleries are viewable at Kodak C135 Gallery & Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| C135 | TG-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Kodak C135
| TG-2 iHS | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | June 2013 | January 2012 | Fresher by 17 months | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.4" | Larger display (+0.6") | |
| Display resolution | 610k | 112k | Clearer display (+498k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak C135 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
| C135 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and volume. The Kodak C135 provides exterior measurements of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-2 iHS has sizing of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak C135 and Olympus TG-2 iHS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the C135 and the TG-2 iHS.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the C135 and TG-2 iHS is 92 and 91 respectively.
Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to see the gap in sensor sizing merely by going through specs. The graphic underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the C135 and TG-2 iHS.
All in all, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Kodak C135 to provide extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The older C135 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C135 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare C135 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
| Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2012-01-10 | 2013-06-28 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1250 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35mm (1x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.4 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 112k dot | 610k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 175g (0.39 lb) | 230g (0.51 lb) |
| Dimensions | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 shots |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $0 | $380 |