Clicky

Kodak C135 vs Olympus VR-330

Portability
92
Imaging
37
Features
17
Overall
29
Kodak EasyShare C135 front
 
Olympus VR-330 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
38
Overall
37

Kodak C135 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs

Kodak C135
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.4" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1250
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35mm (F3.0) lens
  • 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Revealed February 2011
  • Old Model is Olympus VR-320
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Kodak C135 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview

Below, we will be comparing the Kodak C135 vs Olympus VR-330, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Kodak and Olympus. The resolution of the C135 (14MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is relatively comparable and they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The C135 was brought out 12 months after the VR-330 so they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a quick summation of how the C135 grades vs the VR-330 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary

        

Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Olympus VR-330

 C135 VR-330 
RevealedJanuary 2012February 2011More modern by 12 months

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Kodak C135

 VR-330 C135 
Screen dimension3"2.4"Bigger screen (+0.6")
Screen resolution460k112kSharper screen (+348k dot)

Common features in the Kodak C135 and Olympus VR-330

 C135 VR-330 
Manually focus No manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch screen Missing Touch screen

Kodak C135 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Kodak C135 has got physical dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Olympus VR-330 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Check the Kodak C135 vs Olympus VR-330 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have during that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the C135 compared to the VR-330.

Kodak C135 vs Olympus VR-330 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the C135 and VR-330 is 92 and 94 respectively.

Kodak C135 vs Olympus VR-330 top view buttons comparison

Kodak C135 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes just by checking out technical specs. The image below will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the C135 and VR-330.

As you can tell, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same MP so you can expect comparable quality of photos however you have to consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The more modern C135 provides an advantage in sensor technology.

Kodak C135 vs Olympus VR-330 sensor size comparison

Kodak C135 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak C135 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Kodak C135
Portrait photography with Olympus VR-330
33
good resolution (14MP)
features face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
33
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
provides face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Kodak C135 Street photography factors
Olympus VR-330 Street photography factors
53
weather proofing
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
low max ISO (1,250)
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (158 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Kodak C135 Sports photography features
Olympus VR-330 Sports photography features
31
good resolution (14MP)
weather proofing
focal length is fixed (35mm)
low max shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
47
excellent zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
provides tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Kodak C135 Travel photography factors
Olympus VR-330 Travel photography factors
64
weather proofing
good resolution (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
doesn't have Time Lapse function
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
70
lighter than average in class (158 grams)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (24mm)
great zoom (300mm)
lack of Timelapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Kodak C135
Landscape photography with Olympus VR-330
31
good resolution (14 megapixels)
weather proofing
lack of manual focus
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen is somewhat small (2.4 inches)
manual exposure not possible
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
low max ISO (1,250)
does not have RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse function
42
really wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
lack of Timelapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak C135 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus VR-330 as a Vlogging camera
25
features face detect focusing
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have mic port
32
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection autofocus
lighter than average in class (158 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external microphone port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Kodak C135 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak C135 and Olympus VR-330
 Kodak EasyShare C135Olympus VR-330
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Olympus
Model Kodak EasyShare C135 Olympus VR-330
Category Waterproof Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2012-01-10 2011-02-08
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 4288 x 3216 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 1250 1600
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35mm (1x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Maximum aperture f/3.0 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focus range - 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.4 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 112k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech TFT color LCD TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 secs 4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/1400 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) 4.70 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 175g (0.39 lb) 158g (0.35 lb)
Dimensions 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model 2 x AA LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $0 $220