Kodak C135 vs Olympus VR-330
92 Imaging
37 Features
17 Overall
29
94 Imaging
36 Features
38 Overall
36
Kodak C135 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed February 2011
- Old Model is Olympus VR-320
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Kodak C135 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Kodak C135 vs Olympus VR-330, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Kodak and Olympus. The resolution of the C135 (14MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is relatively comparable and they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe C135 was brought out 12 months after the VR-330 so they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a quick summation of how the C135 grades vs the VR-330 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak C135 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare C135 & Olympus VR-330. The entire galleries are provided at Kodak C135 Gallery & Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Olympus VR-330
| C135 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 | February 2011 | More modern by 12 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Kodak C135
| VR-330 | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 112k | Sharper screen (+348k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak C135 and Olympus VR-330
| C135 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | No manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Kodak C135 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Kodak C135 has got physical dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Olympus VR-330 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Kodak C135 vs Olympus VR-330 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have during that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the C135 compared to the VR-330.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the C135 and VR-330 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Kodak C135 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes just by checking out technical specs. The image below will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the C135 and VR-330.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same MP so you can expect comparable quality of photos however you have to consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The more modern C135 provides an advantage in sensor technology.
Kodak C135 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Kodak C135 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C135 | Olympus VR-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare C135 | Olympus VR-330 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2012-01-10 | 2011-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 1250 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35mm (1x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.4 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 112k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 175g (0.39 lb) | 158g (0.35 lb) |
| Dimensions | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 2 x AA | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $220 |