Kodak C135 vs Olympus VR-340
92 Imaging
37 Features
17 Overall
29
![Kodak EasyShare C135 front Kodak EasyShare C135 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Kodak-EasyShare-C135/Kodak-C135-front.jpg)
![Olympus VR-340 front Olympus VR-340 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-VR-340/Olympus-VR-340-front.jpg)
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Kodak C135 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Kodak C135 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Kodak C135 versus Olympus VR-340, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the C135 (14MP) and the VR-340 (16MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras provide the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
The C135 was announced around the same time to the VR-340 which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief view of how the C135 matches up against the VR-340 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Kodak C135 vs Olympus VR-340 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare C135 & Olympus VR-340. The whole galleries are provided at Kodak C135 Gallery & Olympus VR-340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Olympus VR-340
C135 | VR-340 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Kodak C135
VR-340 | C135 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.6") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 112k | Sharper screen (+348k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak C135 and Olympus VR-340
C135 | VR-340 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2012 | ![]() | January 2012 | Similar age |
Manual focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch screen |
Kodak C135 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Kodak C135 has got external measurements of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Olympus VR-340 has proportions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak C135 versus Olympus VR-340 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at the time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the C135 and the VR-340.
![Kodak C135 vs Olympus VR-340 size comparison Kodak C135 vs Olympus VR-340 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-C135-vs-Olympus-VR-340-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the C135 and VR-340 is 92 and 96 respectively.
![Kodak C135 vs Olympus VR-340 top view buttons comparison Kodak C135 vs Olympus VR-340 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-C135-vs-Olympus-VR-340-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Kodak C135 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to see the gap between sensor sizing merely by checking technical specs. The graphic underneath might give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the C135 and VR-340.
As you have seen, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Olympus VR-340 to give extra detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots way more aggressively.
![Kodak C135 vs Olympus VR-340 sensor size comparison Kodak C135 vs Olympus VR-340 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-C135-vs-Olympus-VR-340-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Kodak C135 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder
![Kodak C135 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak C135 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-C135-vs-Olympus-VR-340-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Kodak C135 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare C135 | Olympus VR-340 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Kodak | Olympus |
Model | Kodak EasyShare C135 | Olympus VR-340 |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2012-01-10 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1250 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35mm (1x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0 | f/3.0-5.7 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.4 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 112 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) | 4.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 175 grams (0.39 pounds) | 125 grams (0.28 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | 2 x AA | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $0 | $130 |