Kodak C135 vs Olympus XZ-1
92 Imaging
37 Features
17 Overall
29
88 Imaging
34 Features
51 Overall
40
Kodak C135 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Revealed January 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Kodak C135 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Kodak C135 versus Olympus XZ-1, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. There is a significant difference among the sensor resolutions of the C135 (14MP) and XZ-1 (10MP) and the C135 (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") feature different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe C135 was revealed 12 months later than the XZ-1 so they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a full comparison, below is a simple overview of how the C135 scores versus the XZ-1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak C135 vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare C135 and Olympus XZ-1. The full galleries are provided at Kodak C135 Gallery and Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Olympus XZ-1
| C135 | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 | January 2011 | More recent by 12 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Kodak C135
| XZ-1 | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.4" | Larger display (+0.6") | |
| Display resolution | 614k | 112k | Clearer display (+502k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak C135 and Olympus XZ-1
| C135 | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Kodak C135 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Kodak C135 comes with outside measurements of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-1 has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") and a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Look at the Kodak C135 versus Olympus XZ-1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the C135 vs the XZ-1.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the C135 and XZ-1 is 92 and 88 respectively.
Kodak C135 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to visualize the gap in sensor measurements just by researching specs. The photograph here may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the C135 and XZ-1.
All in all, both of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The C135 using its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field trickier and the Kodak C135 will provide you with extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos much more aggressively. The fresher C135 should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Kodak C135 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Kodak C135 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C135 | Olympus XZ-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare C135 | Olympus XZ-1 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2012-01-10 | 2011-01-26 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic V |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.63" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 44.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3664 x 2752 |
| Max native ISO | 1250 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35mm (1x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.4 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 112 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 175g (0.39 lb) | 275g (0.61 lb) |
| Dimensions | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 34 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 117 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 320 photos |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $567 |