Kodak C135 vs Panasonic FX700
92 Imaging
37 Features
17 Overall
29
94 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
Kodak C135 vs Panasonic FX700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 176g - 104 x 56 x 25mm
- Launched July 2010
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Kodak C135 vs Panasonic FX700 Overview
Following is a thorough comparison of the Kodak C135 vs Panasonic FX700, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Kodak and Panasonic. The resolution of the C135 (14MP) and the FX700 (14MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe C135 was introduced 18 months after the FX700 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a detailed comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the C135 scores versus the FX700 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Kodak C135 vs Panasonic FX700 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare C135 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700. The whole galleries are viewable at Kodak C135 Gallery & Panasonic FX700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Panasonic FX700
| C135 | FX700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 | July 2010 | More modern by 18 months |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX700 over the Kodak C135
| FX700 | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 112k | Crisper screen (+118k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Kodak C135 and Panasonic FX700
| C135 | FX700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Kodak C135 vs Panasonic FX700 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Kodak C135 comes with external measurements of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Panasonic FX700 has proportions of 104mm x 56mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs).
See the Kodak C135 vs Panasonic FX700 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have during that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the C135 and the FX700.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the C135 and FX700 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Kodak C135 vs Panasonic FX700 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to see the difference in sensor sizes purely by going through technical specs. The image below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the C135 and FX700.
As you can tell, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same exact resolution so you can expect comparable quality of photographs but you should really take the launch date of the cameras into account. The younger C135 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Kodak C135 vs Panasonic FX700 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Kodak C135 vs Panasonic FX700 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C135 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Kodak | Panasonic |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare C135 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-01-10 | 2010-07-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Venus Engine FHD |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 1250 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35mm (1x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0 | f/2.2-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.4 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 112 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 60s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) | 7.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 175g (0.39 lb) | 176g (0.39 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 104 x 56 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $0 | $399 |